|
| yeehaw |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: good luck finding any oil leaks lol Oil leaks!!!!! In a Windsor!!!!!....NEVER..lolol....... |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
{USERNAME} wrote:  Considering the original intent for the cam in your engine, Cammed as F@#K is right. Most people would call it big for an atmo engine. PS, you need to update your sig. Crow st2 is a girly cam. |
||
| Top | |
||
| thebeast. |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: my set up for the moment  after doing my intake i have noticed the piping getting pretty hot during day driving. has anyone wrapped there's in exhaust wrap or anything similar |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
{USERNAME} wrote: after doing my intake i have noticed the piping getting pretty hot during day driving. has anyone wrapped there's in exhaust wrap or anything similar I did it years ago. Most people don't because it doesn't look shiny |
||
| Top | |
||
| thebeast. |
|
||
|
that's what first put me off but in the end what's better, shiny intake or colder air.
would exhaust wrap or manifold wrap work/ be suitable |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
I just used exhaust wrap.
Soak it in water first and it won't make you itch and it will also wrap tighter when it wet. |
||
| Top | |
||
| thebeast. |
|
||
|
that's what first put me off but in the end what's better, shiny intake or colder air.
would exhaust wrap or manifold wrap work/ be suitable |
||
| Top | |
||
| thebeast. |
|
||
|
sweet thanks. had a read online and a few people have said exhaust wrap is designed to keep heat in, so it would have a negative effect.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| rustyeb1991 |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: sweet thanks. had a read online and a few people have said exhaust wrap is designed to keep heat in, so it would have a negative effect. exhaust wrap is there to reduce heat transfer either way so on a cold air intake the intake temp will remain cooler, |
||
| Top | |
||
| thebeast. |
|
||
|
that's wit i thought. gives me something to do today
|
||
| Top | |
||
| huggiebear |
|
|||
|
and its a complete waste of time and money. it has been PROVEN!!!! that the speed of the air travelling through the pipe is too fast to take on any heat in the pipe work. it has been proven that you can run a pipe straight over the exhaust and it will have no effect on intake temps. heat wrap on an intake is just wank factor which will make you itchy every time you touch it
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
{USERNAME} wrote: and its a complete waste of time and money. it has been PROVEN!!!! that the speed of the air travelling through the pipe is too fast to take on any heat in the pipe work. it has been proven that you can run a pipe straight over the exhaust and it will have no effect on intake temps. heat wrap on an intake is just wank factor which will make you itchy every time you touch it Actually I proved that you are wrong, AND I documented it in a thread on this forum. Nothing beats first hand testing and experience. |
||
| Top | |
||
| huggiebear |
|
|||
|
or you are wrong. its all in this thread if you read
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| thebeast. |
|
||
|
well doesn't that make this entire thread pointless if cold air intakes are just wank factor?
|
||
| Top | |
||
| huggiebear |
|
|||
|
no i said heat wrap is wank factor on an intake. not CAI
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
