|
| brad17djr |
|
|||
|
14.5 not bad for a stock 6 speed auto fg on a hot day too:) any one beat it? still after a typhoon exhaust for it
_________________ 2 FOR TURNING & 2 FOR BURNING Last edited by brad17djr on Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| skidder |
|
|||
|
I am assuming N/A? Why do you want a typhoon exhaust?
Save your pennies for aftermarket headers first. The gain from headers even with stock catback will easily outweigh the gain of changing to a typhoon catback (or even a better quality aftermarket cat back) with the stock manifold unless something in your system is dead/clogged.
_________________ EVL098 wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| 4dlvr |
|
||
|
brad17djr wrote: 14.5 not bad for a stock 6 speed auto fg on a hot day too:) any one beat it? still after a typhoon exhaust for it thats a ver good time, do you have a time slip for it?? i would love to no your 60ft time and trap speed also where did you race it??
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT |
||
| Top | |
||
| brad17djr |
|
|||
|
I raced at WSID last wensday afternoon and i do have a time slip 60ft was 2.262 and trap speed was 156.33km/h
_________________ 2 FOR TURNING & 2 FOR BURNING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ebxr82nv |
|
||
|
When I ran my 15.3 @144kmh in my au I got a 2.1 60ft. Just goest to show the zf boxes are unreal for top end pickup.
_________________ 9/98 AU1 XR6hp-about to retire from the road and be reborn on the race track. |
||
| Top | |
||
| 4dlvr |
|
||
|
that is a fairly decent trap speed,
i reckon you could improve you 60ft time a fair bit though... it would be very interesting to see how much you can gain on a cool night.. either way congrats on the excellent time..
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT |
||
| Top | |
||
| ebxr82nv |
|
||
|
4dlvr wrote: that is a fairly decent trap speed, i reckon you could improve you 60ft time a fair bit though... it would be very interesting to see how much you can gain on a cool night.. either way congrats on the excellent time.. The only effective way to improve the 60ft times would be to change the diff gears to something better than the stock 2.72:1 ratio
_________________ 9/98 AU1 XR6hp-about to retire from the road and be reborn on the race track. |
||
| Top | |
||
| 4dlvr |
|
||
|
big burnout to warm the tires up,
run better/stickier tires find the best rpm to stall before take off most of the 60ft time is implemented by the take off itself, although a better diff ratio will shorten the revs i think it will do more harm then good causing major wheel spin, remember zf ratios are nothing like a long btr 4speed.. thats a average 60ft time, with more attempts and luck a 2.0 is easily possible
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT |
||
| Top | |
||
| brad17djr |
|
|||
|
Thanks mate im hoping to throw some goodies on and maby on a cold night crack a 13 how can i improve my 60ft? it wheel spins a fair bit of the line
_________________ 2 FOR TURNING & 2 FOR BURNING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ebxr82nv |
|
||
|
When I say shorter gears I don't mean anything as savage as 4.11's, a3.23 or 3.45 set at the most. As for tyres I highly doubt that car would have had to much of an issue with wheelspin on that track even without a burnout to heat the tyres. The soft IRS probly made it bog down a little to much and if it was stalled to hard the torque limiting function may have cut in. I can only assume at this point that the car is still fitted with the factory crudlops, which only get worse the hotter they get in my experience, therfore all you'll get from a big burnout is a photo op and extra heat soak.
_________________ 9/98 AU1 XR6hp-about to retire from the road and be reborn on the race track. |
||
| Top | |
||
| brad17djr |
|
|||
|
already getting pacmaker 4495's so im after the typhoon cat back so i can build a custom set up there is'nt any after market exhausts out yet for the fg that im aware of so im going to build my own up it will be cheaper too:) then get it tuned when the extractors go on because it brings the engine light on with out a tune i made 160rwkw and it had way to much back presure
_________________ 2 FOR TURNING & 2 FOR BURNING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| 4dlvr |
|
||
|
im confused, have you dynod you car at 160rwkw stock standard??
thats quite an amazing figure
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT |
||
| Top | |
||
| brad17djr |
|
|||
|
yes stock power run was 160rwkw i've yet to modify it
_________________ 2 FOR TURNING & 2 FOR BURNING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ebxr82nv |
|
||
|
Times you can't argue with but 160rwkw stock I think
is a bit rich, I figure it should be around the 140-145 mark in reality. At the end of the day dynos lie. Please note I'm not putting s**t on you or your car with any part of this. What brand was the dyno?
_________________ 9/98 AU1 XR6hp-about to retire from the road and be reborn on the race track. |
||
| Top | |
||
| brad17djr |
|
|||
|
i think the brand is dynolog but true dyno's lie but on the same day a ba gt manual made 186rwkw stock
_________________ 2 FOR TURNING & 2 FOR BURNING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 38 guests |
