|
| fiftyone |
|
|||
|
syko4d wrote: any news??
im very interested in this I'd like to ask a different question, when can we expect specs on this? a set date? a fortnight? etc?
_________________ ** For Sale ** http://www.fordmods.com/ford-parts-for-sale-f17/assorted-e-series-parts-t124697.html |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Grimketel |
|
|||
|
fiftyone wrote: syko4d wrote: any news?? im very interested in this I'd like to ask a different question, when can we expect specs on this? a set date? a fortnight? etc? when details are available they will be posted. Other than that we have to respect the workload the crew at crescent are under and hold on tight for the release of more info. There are 145 posts in here from crescent saying they will post when the info is available.
_________________ enough isn't enough |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| syko4d |
|
|||
|
we dont mean to pressure them wich i guess we are
but for someone like me that is just about to rebuild a motor id like to see what these are like i might get one of these instead didnt mean to be rude
_________________ now playing with a v8 to hahaha |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
low_ryda wrote: i love all the previous posts in the past about not being able to stroke a 4.0 6
multiplie mentions of "it's already stroked" come to mind.. this isn't a stroker, its a big bore conversion. but if you'd read the first page you'd have known that already |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
soemthing that crossed my mind just now, is that if you use one of these blocks and put a 3.2L crank in it you'll end up with one rev happy 3.9L engine with a bore/stroke of 1.27 and a stroke/rod of 2.003.
just think about that for a while. that almost 4L of 8000RPM madness |
||
| Top | |
||
| Redford |
|
|||
|
tickford_6 wrote: soemthing that crossed my mind just now, is that if you use one of these blocks and put a 3.2L crank in it you'll end up with one rev happy 3.9L engine with a bore/stroke of 1.27 and a stroke/rod of 2.003.
just think about that for a while. that almost 4L of 8000RPM madness apart from being rare the 3.2 crank only has a 79.4 mm stroke so the cubic capacity will allways be lower when compared to the 4.0 @ 99.29 mm with the same bore, no mater what length of the rods are. 
_________________ Speed Safely! |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Redford |
|
|||
|
lol, i just realised what you ment (wasnt thinking outside the square, lol) 3.2 crank with the larger bore @ 4ltr is alot of power. :S
edit: but, i think it still works out smaller @ 3.8ltr because of the shorter stroke 
_________________ Speed Safely! |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| biggav |
|
|||
|
still revs are your friend hehe
yeh there is a few guys over here in the west that are looking at this with baited breath, whenever that time might be.
_________________ 4.0lt Balanced Bottom End, ACL Race Internals, Rspec4 Cam, BPT Swichchip, PH4480, 2.5' Lukey, Scorcher Bodykit, T5 Manual frd906 wrote: LOLLOLLOLLOLOLLOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
Redford wrote: lol, i just realised what you ment (wasnt thinking outside the square, lol) 3.2 crank with the larger bore @ 4ltr is alot of power. :S
edit: but, i think it still works out smaller @ 3.8ltr because of the shorter stroke yeah it's like 3.87. but you'd probably have to use custom rods so you could get big a little smaller then stock and have the crank offset ground a bit to make up for it |
||
| Top | |
||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
or give a 221 crank a shot. Doesnt look that hard to fit one in a 4.0 block.
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| BuNtEr |
|
||
|
my car is a 5.0 i wish i had one of Joes 4.8s as what i have seen with his cams and heads it would be a bloody ball tearer
you guys uing wade game are just wasting your time and money get one of CMS cams and heads the last dyno day proves CMS work
_________________ BANNED |
||
| Top | |
||
| EFFalcon |
|
|||
|
BuNtEr wrote: you guys uing wade game are just wasting your time and money get one of CMS cams and heads the last dyno day proves CMS work
fairly hefty statement there... yes CMS works... but so does Wade. i'd hardly say ur wasting your time.
_________________ FALCN6 - EF GLi Turbo, 20" Rims, Air Bag Suspension, Straight LPG, 225rwkw |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
BuNtEr wrote: you guys uing wade game are just wasting your time and money get one of CMS cams and heads the last dyno day proves CMS work you fukin kidding me?....... why belittle another sponsor on here, they do great work and their cams run some of the toughest cars in the country. While no doubt CMS also do great work, i wish i was there for the dyno day to give his sixes some healthy competition
|
||
| Top | |
||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
BuNtEr wrote: you guys uing wade game are just wasting your time and money get one of CMS cams and heads the last dyno day proves CMS work
It was that attitude that helped make JMM so popular 
... but what would I know - i use Wade cams
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| pkr |
|
|||
|
Dont know if anyone has mentioned using a 300 canadian 6 crank.
I knew of a guy back approx 20 years ago who built a TE cortina 4.1 crossflow and had fitted one of these cranks into it. I had never been in it but one of my friends said he had and apparently this thing turned the tyre in all 4 gears. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests |
