|
| gryph |
|
|||
|
hey guys how many cubic inches is an el 4.0?????
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| bowsaw |
|
|||
|
Around 248, 4.1 is 250, roughly.
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| gryph |
|
|||
|
thanks mate
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ElwoodBlues |
|
||
|
I read somewhere on here it is 243ci
_________________ EF Futura factory 5 spd
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Waggin |
|
|||
|
Yeah, 243cui
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [Supercharged 363 LTD Build] |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| dope dogg |
|
||
|
one inch is approx = to 2.54 cm
therefore one cubic inch (1^3 in) = 2.54^3 = 16.387 cm^3 dig? so 4 litres = 4000 cm^3 / 16.387 cm^3 = 244.09
_________________ Now I'm disgruntled; before this I had been relatively gruntled |
||
| Top | |
||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
The 4L engien is 3984cc not 4000cc
so that puts it at 243.1 CI
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
3.983L is 243cui
|
||
| Top | |
||
| twr7cx |
|
|||
|
61ci to the litre, the 4.0L SOHC I6's are actually a tad under 4L, 3983cc or something can't remember, so 243/244 is about right...
EDIT: just read above and they're more acurate... |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| MYLO_XR6 |
|
||
|
ahhhh yes, the tryhards of the chryslers hemi 6!
that wouldnt be a bad project, slapping a hemi 265 in my BA 
a new theme would start: HEY FALCON!!!
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| twr7cx |
|
|||
|
MYLO_XR6 wrote: ahhhh yes, the tryhards of the chryslers hemi 6!
that wouldnt be a bad project, slapping a hemi 265 in my BA a new theme would start: HEY FALCON!!! Wouldn't you love an updated DOHC fuel injected version of the old 265? |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| MYLO_XR6 |
|
||
|
not really, my first car was a VK charger, (i had it when i was 17 and sold it in January) and the fuel economy on that thing would s**t all over the barra 6...not to mention the crazy bottom end torque....wheelspin off the lights? NO PROBLEMO!
_________________
|
||
| Top | |
||
| twr7cx |
|
|||
|
You got good fuel economy out of it? s**t! The VJ was costing us a fortune to run around in, 265 Hemi built to E49 spec inside, and then a 4 barrel Holley vaccum seconday for induction. 4 speed Borg Warner single rail on her and standard diff.But then again we were booting it all the time!
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| zk |
|
||
|
twr7cx wrote: You got good fuel economy out of it? s**t! The VJ was costing us a fortune to run around in, 265 Hemi built to E49 spec inside, and then a 4 barrel Holley vaccum seconday for induction. 4 speed Borg Warner single rail on her and standard diff.But then again we were booting it all the time!
thats how they are ment to be driven i thought tho?!
_________________ Member Of "Team LWB"
|
||
| Top | |
||
| nicco |
|
|||
|
twr7cx wrote: MYLO_XR6 wrote: ahhhh yes, the tryhards of the chryslers hemi 6! that wouldnt be a bad project, slapping a hemi 265 in my BA a new theme would start: HEY FALCON!!! Wouldn't you love an updated DOHC fuel injected version of the old 265? Thatd be an awesome motor!! and to agree with everyone on the original question... see my sig!! 
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 92 guests |
