|
| djuman |
|
||
|
can anyone tell me any major differences bla bla bla between an EB and EA engine - besides the s**ty air intake on the EA!!!
could you do a direct swap over or get cams new pistons and all the other good stuff done 2 an EA motor then put it straight into an EB???? my guess is yes but id rather some1 who actually no's to tell me
_________________ '98' EL XR6 Pacemaker headers, 2 1/2 inch (header back) exhaust with Hi-Flow CAT, IC&E coil and 9mm leads, NGK plugs, billet short throw shifter >147.9rwKw
|
||
| Top | |
||
| cjh |
|
|||
|
Is this EB or EBII ????. EB is 3.9 and EBII is 4.0.
_________________ http://youtu.be/jJTh9F3Vgg0 |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| djuman |
|
||
|
EB 3.9 EB 4.0 either dont matter. wats the difference between them
_________________ '98' EL XR6 Pacemaker headers, 2 1/2 inch (header back) exhaust with Hi-Flow CAT, IC&E coil and 9mm leads, NGK plugs, billet short throw shifter >147.9rwKw
|
||
| Top | |
||
| cjh |
|
|||
|
The bore size, stroke is the same. The cyl head combustion chamber design is different. The engine loom is different too. Its only small stuff.
_________________ http://youtu.be/jJTh9F3Vgg0 |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| naughtyfalcon |
|
|||
|
yeah,its mainly cosmetic the differences,ea eb1 had the same engines,same box's etc,eb2 got the 4 litre
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ...Dunkly |
|
||
|
EA = s**t, EB = not so s**t. i think that sums it up
|
||
| Top | |
||
| cjh |
|
|||
|
My old girl goes well, an 88EA 'S' 3.9 MPFI 5sp LSD as ordered from Ford in Stark white. It does for what I want.
_________________ http://youtu.be/jJTh9F3Vgg0 |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| naughtyfalcon |
|
|||
|
my ea normaly goes very well,,except when i f**k it up.
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| fastleno |
|
|||
|
if only ford had used the 250 crossflow in ea's thay would have been a very reliable car, or a cast iron head 3.9
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Walker |
|
|||
|
EB 2 had a much better front end, and they also run 28 spline axles compared to 25 in the EA and EB 1.
Air intakes were the same, you must be thinking of the CFI. You'd have no dramas fitting the EA engine into EB. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| madmax |
|
|||
|
...Dunkly wrote: EA = s**t, EB = not so s**t. i think that sums it up
That's a bit of generalisation! There was nothing wrong with my EAII when I bought it, it served me well and was in good condition when I sold it! So they weren't all s**t.
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Walker |
|
|||
|
LOL, they were known as a lemon when they first came out Max, surely you remember that?
But like any new model, once they sorted out all the s**t problems they turned out to be a good car. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| madmax |
|
|||
|
Walker wrote: LOL, they were known as a lemon when they first came out Max, surely you remember that?
But like any new model, once they sorted out all the s**t problems they turned out to be a good car. When I bought mine I was told to stay away from the series 1's. As most of the problems were meant to have been sorted out by the time the series 2 arrived. Unfortunately the stigma of the series 1 left people think the 2's were the same. Funny how a series 1 EB is a tarted up EAII yet people except it as a far better car.
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| naughtyfalcon |
|
|||
|
Quote: When I bought mine I was told to stay away from the series 1's. As most of the problems were meant to have been sorted out by the time the series 2 arrived. Unfortunately the stigma of the series 1 left people think the 2's were the same.
Funny how a series 1 EB is a tarted up EAII yet people except it as a far better car. spot on,,the s1 eb are the same as a s2 ea yet everybody thinks they're such a better car,the only difference is cosmetic. but in saying that,i have seen s1 eb's with cfi.
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Dansedgli |
|
||
|
Walker wrote: EB 2 had a much better front end.
How so? |
||
| Top | |
||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests |
