|
FAST-XR |
|
|||
|
Quote: FAST-XR wrote:
a modded i6 will be ahead of the ls1 and ls2 until we hit 3rd gear (manual) which is about 100kmh, after that its time to show them your brake lights to rub it in... if you dont stop at that point and try to keep going in 3rd gear you will only be embarrassed by them as they drive past with ease! Quote: ha,ha..show em the brake lights!!! very true- either that or pull in fronta them?? *lol* haha its cuts them up real bad!
_________________ 07 BF MKII XR6T |
|||
Top | |
ge2589 |
|
|||
|
yeh my mate has a vp and it no where nears beats me top end and i have a auto it takes a while to get it there but yeh like u said pull out infront and don't look bak
_________________ Fairlaine XR, it’s the James Bond of Fords |
|||
Top | |
howsie |
|
|||
|
samftr wrote: do it at the drags howsie, get a timeslip to prove it too mate, then you can jam the non believers
i would love to but alas the poor EA had to get sold. Was falling apart at the seems. I drove that thing like it was stolen had it for 2.5 years changed the oil twice, blew four clutch's, snapped an axle, puled the clutch cable through the firewall and the clutch pedal fell off (Back in the s**pid days) But when driving it down to be traded for my BA dad drove behind me and swears that it didn't blow an ounce of smoke the whole trip and i cained it the whole way there. and the gearbox was still in excellent nick wish i still had it
_________________ Current cars |
|||
Top | |
my el project |
|
|||
|
Southy wrote: yeah i agree that the early e series autos wernt that quik. but once you start talking about manuals its completly different
As much as i like fords my brother had a vn manual and i hav an el and there was know comparison
_________________ El Futura
|
|||
Top | |
MADEA |
|
||
|
yeah but i bet your el is an auto and imagine if the falcon auto's had the same gearing as the commodore auto's the falcons would be struggling to put all that tourque to the ground with out the tyre's turning to smoke
|
||
Top | |
cboz |
|
|||
|
The VN is something like 1/2 tonne lighter too, the engine in it's self is a POS.
|
|||
Top | |
edfairmont4.0 |
|
|||
|
cboz wrote: The VN is something like 1/2 tonne lighter too, the engine in it's self is a POS.
CORRECT.
_________________ ED Fairmont, Ghia mock DOHC-T 11.6 @ 118 Trying to get back to the 1/4! |
|||
Top | |
skidder |
|
|||
|
can someone find some stock i6 dyno graphs and stock v6 graphs so this thread can end lol
_________________ EVL098 wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. |
|||
Top | |
edfairmont4.0 |
|
|||
|
i was reading the kind of mods people with commodore v6's do to make more power some dude had pacemaker extractors crow cam, 1.97 or some s**t rocker ratio, chip, cold air intake then he made 128rwkw.... seriously i think the FORD I6 is about 30rwkw infront and about 80nm infront of the v6. There is no comparison.
_________________ ED Fairmont, Ghia mock DOHC-T 11.6 @ 118 Trying to get back to the 1/4! |
|||
Top | |
4dlvr |
|
||
|
edfairmont4.0 wrote: cboz wrote: The VN is something like 1/2 tonne lighter too, the engine in it's self is a POS. CORRECT. a average falcon weighs about 1500. a vn weighs 1300. 200kg not 500kg.
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT |
||
Top | |
MADEA |
|
||
|
my mate's VR made 101.3 rwkw with pacemaker extractors, 3 inch mandrel bend exhaust, chiptourque chip and cold air intake a 4.0 litre would make heaps more power with the same mods so that make them better obviously
|
||
Top | |
edfairmont4.0 |
|
|||
|
MADEA wrote: my mate's VR made 101.3 rwkw with pacemaker extractors, 3 inch mandrel bend exhaust, chiptourque chip and cold air intake a 4.0 litre would make heaps more power with the same mods so that make them better obviously
hahahahhahahahahahhaah fully sick commodore yeah my modified commodore runs as much power as a stock falcon. Edit: Less power maybe as much as a falcon on gas.
_________________ ED Fairmont, Ghia mock DOHC-T 11.6 @ 118 Trying to get back to the 1/4! |
|||
Top | |
locknut |
|
|||
|
||||
Top | |
cboz |
|
|||
|
MADEA wrote: my mate's VR made 101.3 rwkw with pacemaker extractors, 3 inch mandrel bend exhaust, chiptourque chip and cold air intake a 4.0 litre would make heaps more power with the same mods so that make them better obviously
HAHA, thats a shocker. |
|||
Top | |
krisisdog |
|
|||
|
my el project wrote: As much as i like fords my brother had a vn manual and i hav an el and there was know comparison A) get a manual B) learn to drive said manual. I dont see why this argument is still going.... theres only 203cc of difference between the 3.8 (3791cc) and 4.0 (3984cc), which is about 4% difference. The power difference, especially torque, is far in excess of 4%. 1992 Commodore Power 127kW @ 4800rpm Torque 293Nm @ 3600rpm vs 1992 Falcon Power 148kW @ 4500rpm Torque 348Nm @ 3750rpm 1995 commodore Power 147kW @ 5200rpm Torque 304Nm @ 3600rpm vs 1995 falcon Power 157kW @ 4900rpm Torque 357Nm @ 3000rpm 2002 Commodore Power 152kW @ 5200rpm Torque 305Nm @ 3600rpm- vs 2002 Falcon Power 182kW @ 5000rpm Torque 380Nm @ 3250rpm hmm lets see..... i think the commodore loses in all of those. a 1992 falcon has more torque than a 2002 commodore. a 1995 falcon has more power AND torque than a 2002 commodore. Thats not including the XR6 either, which has more power and torque again. Does this prove that Falcon i6's win yet? |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests |