|
| aggregate |
|
||
|
My old 97 Fairmont used about 12.8 Lt per 100k around town, which was reasonable for a large family sedan. I found slipping the auto into neutral down hills and so on definitely saved on fuel consumption. Just don’t accidentally put it into to reverse it ain’t pretty.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| EBTS50 |
|
|||
|
did u hit reverse??
_________________ Ba Stock As A Rock |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| aggregate |
|
||
|
Yeah hit reverse once at about 40km an hour gear box made a shocking bang and stalled instantly. Restarted all right and didn’t seem to cause any long term problems. Not recommended anyone tries this.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| smiley235 |
|
|||
|
my mate told me constantly putting it into neutral was bad for the transmission, but i did notice more economy on the eff. trip in the BA, any transmission experts who know?
_________________ 178.3 rwkw
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
aggregate wrote: I found slipping the auto into neutral down hills and so on definitely saved on fuel consumption.
You must drive down LOTS of hills
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| WindeX |
|
||
|
Not sure how it works with autos but with manuals when you are down shifting and the revs get above a certain level the injectors stop injecting fuel, so you are saving fuel... so the lession is dont put it in neutral to save down hills if you own a manual, because in neutral the ECU will put a certain amount of fuel in to keep the car idling.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| aggregate |
|
||
|
Yeah thats interesting to hear about the manual scenario. Anyone found that using optimax fuel seems to get a few more k's out of a tank?
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 76 guests |
