|
EL_Fairmont |
|
||
|
Well i had to get rid of my rampod setup because Suncorp insurance were going to raise my excess by $400. So i put the $30 pod in the shed for another day( might mount in airbox later on?).
I put the 3in pod adaptor to good use, acting as a bellmouth in the EL airbox lid. Drove car about 5min ago and it does have the same throttle response as the rampod, just no loud roaring induction noise. cheers Luke. Last edited by EL_Fairmont on Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total. |
||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
I can never understand why people go for pods. I've passed 180RWKW on a Naturally Aspirated 4L Falcon with a K&N Panel filter, stock intake plumbing and stock throttle body!
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [Supercharged 363 LTD Build] |
|||
Top | |
PSIWGN |
|
|||
|
Waggin wrote: I can never understand why people go for pods. I've passed 180RWKW on a Naturally Aspirated 4L Falcon with a K&N Panel filter, stock intake plumbing and stock throttle body! the pod has that wicked induction noise,ii cant get enough of that dooorrrrppp!
|
|||
Top | |
smoke_ |
|
|||
|
but people don't realise that an exposed pod in the engine bay will give your car LESS power (once the engine bay heats up).
_________________ NEW RIDE - FPV FG F6 6spd Auto. 12.26@114MPH, 1.88 60FT on Cheapy Tyres with 38PSI - Stock except K&N filter! |
|||
Top | |
EFfalconsrule |
|
||
|
Yeah that is why I put my pod in the original air box. I use the pod coz it has more surface area than a pannel. No real other advantages.
_________________ Stage 1 stereo install done. Pics in audio section. |
||
Top | |
fuzion |
|
||
|
i swear we posted this already lol
|
||
Top | |
EFXRWGN |
|
|||
|
fuzion wrote: i swear we posted this already lol
I am in total agreement. I had a pod under the bonnet, took it off infavour of standard airbox and K&N panel. The response has been significant!!!
_________________
|
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 95 guests |