|
| badkiwi |
|
|||
|
yes thats wat im talkin abt the pic is exactly wat im tailin abt was it hard to do an is there an noitceable change, im thinking this as there is a more direct route to thottle body.ps where can b done out my way
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| phongus |
|
|||
|
EL__Fairmont wrote:   looks so dodgy. I see he just rotated the top half of the BBM the other way and then rotated the whole TB upside down so that the ISC is underneath. LoL.
Looks funny and dodgy but I think it may have actually worked. I say keep the stock set up...upgrade the intake with a 3" if you like but stock is just fine. phong =P~
_________________ phongus = Post whore 2006 |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EL__Fairmont |
|
|||
|
phongus wrote: EL__Fairmont wrote: looks so dodgy. I see he just rotated the top half of the BBM the other way and then rotated the whole TB upside down so that the ISC is underneath. LoL.Looks funny and dodgy but I think it may have actually worked. I say keep the stock set up...upgrade the intake with a 3" if you like but stock is just fine. phong =P~ This engine bay pic was original posted by trick_XD (fordforums member). He has since change that mod and has a hole in the bonnet with a round aircleaner straight of the throttle body. very impressive power figures considering it does the 1/4 mile in 13.77 secs N/A. that's right boys no forced induction!!!!!!!!!! Link Below: http://s20.photobucket.com/albums/b229/ ... d87d4e.flv
_________________ 97 EL Fairmont 4l OHC .Silver. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
Very impressive to sat the least.He must be putting out 250rwkws with a 2.177 60 footer,13.7 at 105 mph . A bit like forced induction or like nos!!
Harden the f up guys. Every other 13 second runner has 60 foot times much faster than that. Yes the run is on video and the nos was claimed to be removed. It is a pretty unbelievable time to say the least!!
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| twase |
|
|||
|
data_mine wrote: It's been proven a few times, that a larger intake system can provide tangible benefits. Unless of course if its full of LPG and the ignition is not up to scratch. . 
_________________ BF Fairmont Ghia Series II update. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| data_mine |
|
|||
|
I can't help it if you're trying to light your BBQ with a broken piezo 'clicker'.
I've never run a LPG car, so can't comment. But there is plenty of proof around here that the stock intakes are not the best. (and with 250RWKW a 2.1 60' you'd be doing better than a 13.7@105, closer to a 13flat @112 I'd think).
_________________ 1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, 302W, stereo, slow |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| twase |
|
|||
|
data_mine wrote: I can't help it if you're trying to light your BBQ with a broken piezo 'clicker'. LOLdata_mine wrote: But there is plenty of proof around here that the stock intakes are not the best.
_________________ BF Fairmont Ghia Series II update. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 55 guests |
