|
| Grechie |
|
||
|
opto wrote: I recon that the dyno was in 3rd gear and 3.44 ratio diff and Extractors and 2.5 inch exhaust an K&n pod filter
u reckon? wasnt that ur car ? sorry lol - Grechie (114.5rwkw with extractors, exhaust + pod, i would of thought that u would get more)
_________________ Ford Falcon EA Naturally Aspirated 4.0L i6 |
||
| Top | |
||
| edv8wagon |
|
||
|
To make Walkinshaws graph more meaningful perhaps I should include a dyno run for a YZ250, as it is a 2 stroke and has no cam at all it would provide us with a control sample.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| EBXR8380 |
|
|||
|
Are these cams re-ground or billets?? If re-ground they need to be shimmed which is apita to do..
_________________ As in ZOOM 126 edition |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Spork |
|
|||
|
I don't know about you guys but after reading ppl's comments and looking at the dyno graphs, I am starting to think the 1634 is a bit of a dud. Or is it that we havent seen a good back-to-back test yet.
Also could anyone get that 1560a to idle? With an aftermarket ECU it should be right yes?
_________________ Manual EL Gli.
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EFFalcon |
|
|||
|
Spork wrote: I don't know about you guys but after reading ppl's comments and looking at the dyno graphs, I am starting to think the 1634 is a bit of a dud. Or is it that we havent seen a good back-to-back test yet.
Also could anyone get that 1560a to idle? With an aftermarket ECU it should be right yes? a decent back to back test should give a better indication. dyno and 1/4 times are really whats needed. i know of a few cars with 1521a's, and the idle isnt that bad. aftermarket ECU would deffinately help though.
_________________ FALCN6 - EF GLi Turbo, 20" Rims, Air Bag Suspension, Straight LPG, 225rwkw |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Bug |
|
|||
|
That graph being different cars let alone different models with also unspecified mods apart from the cam means i think it should be taken with a grain of salt. I do believe with my 1604 that power above around 4500 drops off a fair bit though, but then I have a tight gas mixer and a clogged k&n so you should take my opinion with a grain of salt
_________________ EL XR6 5spd |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| SIM |
|
|||
|
hmm.. I hope that we start hearing more good feedback about the new profile..
I have a 1604 with pacemakers, 2 1/2" lukey system with a uni filter and i got 168.2 rwhp outta my I6 EF fairmont ghia
_________________ RIP Scotty |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Bug |
|
|||
|
I would be suprised if the 1604 or even the 1636 for that matter really lift peak power much at all. But they do none the less provide a healthy torque increase and certainly a better 0-100 time (can only speak for the 1604)
_________________ EL XR6 5spd |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| USELESS |
|
||
|
That graph shows an auto ford in 2nd gear. JonBays with just extractors and exhaust put out 115rwkws. Where is the power?
Assuming my lack of trust in dynos..I think it needs to be timed to give you a better indication of power increase.This is what counts.
_________________ 14.77 @92.71mph July 06 14.52@95.68mph July 07 14.241 96.7 MPH in a shoebox/taxi au ford wagon!!Bwahahah still cant believe it!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
Spork wrote: I don't know about you guys but after reading ppl's comments and looking at the dyno graphs, I am starting to think the 1634 is a bit of a dud. Or is it that we havent seen a good back-to-back test yet.
Also could anyone get that 1560a to idle? With an aftermarket ECU it should be right yes? 1521a idle is lumpy as hell, but stable - doesnt stall or even try to. I get a lot of confused looks at traffic lights.
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| opto |
|
|||
|
What you have to remember is :-
1, I have an auto that will go into limp mode unless I change the torque converterand I am not changing it just yet, I change gears enough in a s**t Toyota van every day. 2, I wanted something with more grunt than the 1604 cam. 3, For now solution is 1634 or 1004 with 114 phase angle 4, Oh by the way Grechie I didnt ask what gear the dyno was done in, dont try and give me s**t unless you have gone and PAID for a DYNO yourself....
_________________ I post here cos the russian tank driver doesn't |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Walkinshaw |
|
||
|
Ive added a stock dyno run.
The stock dyno run is the EXACT same car as the 1521a, done on the same dyno. 
_________________ Soo many idiots. So few bullets |
||
| Top | |
||
| Walkinshaw |
|
||
|
Oh and yes, i do provide a free bucket of salt with these graphs. They mean 2/10ths of F**k all.
_________________ Soo many idiots. So few bullets |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
Walkinshaw wrote: Ive added a stock dyno run.
The stock dyno run is the EXACT same car as the 1521a, done on the same dyno. ] what extractors were fitted to the car running the 1521a??? oh and i think we should all watch our salt intake. it could be damaging to our health Last edited by tickford_6 on Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total. |
||
| Top | |
||
| stockstandard |
|
|||
|
4480's
_________________ Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests |
