|
|
||
|
||
| falcon1999 |
|
|||
|
What is your choice of Unleaded Petrol?
_________________ What do you call a Hyundai with dual exhausts? |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| racedirector |
|
|||
Age: 63 Posts: 1584 Joined: 20th Mar 2005 Ride: EDL Fairmont Wagon/AU XR8 Ghia Location: Riverstone |
Whatever is cheapest....
_________________ =1994 ED Wagon GLi body/EL Fairmont spec with *ALL* EL running gear.= |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| asizzy |
|
||
|
racedirector wrote: Whatever is cheapest....
_________________ AsIzZy |
||
| Top | |
||
| izedso |
|
|||
|
I don't use Plain old unleaded. Premim and above..
BP or Shell Only. My old Dunnydore used to love Caltex, but the falc only likes BP or Shell. If I could afford it BP Ultimate all the way!!
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| fiftyone |
|
|||
|
Death to shell fuel!
_________________ ** For Sale ** http://www.fordmods.com/ford-parts-for-sale-f17/assorted-e-series-parts-t124697.html |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| izedso |
|
|||
|
fiftyone wrote: Death to shell fuel! Haha, I used to think that as my old car hated it, but current one loves it?? Cruising I get 730+ from BP, 700ish from Shell, 670ish from Caltex (All 98Octane) But was stock ECU on all tests, we shall see the results of TI Performance J3 Chip soon.
_________________
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Froudey |
|
||
|
Petrol is Petrol....
Well is should be.
_________________ R.I.P Tobias my son. |
||
| Top | |
||
| data_mine |
|
|||
|
Vortex98 ONLY.
The GT-P is tuned for it, anything else runs like a**.
_________________ 1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, 302W, stereo, slow |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| skidder |
|
|||
|
Yep, I use 98 octane in my stock engine/*untuned car and noticed an extra 400km per tank
_________________ EVL098 wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. Last edited by skidder on Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| clampy |
|
||
|
i use vortex 95 premium got more kms and runs smoother throught rev range.... would use 98 if i could afford it. lol
_________________ EL Futura 5 speed factory:PH47FL goneeeee |
||
| Top | |
||
| EBMontTom |
|
||
|
Vortex 98 or BP Ultimate. I get a little less km with the Vortex but the car seems to run a little smoother at times when it wouldnt on Ultimate. Vortex also feels like it gives slightly more power but who knows for sure.
_________________ EL XR6 Manual |
||
| Top | |
||
| fowlerj |
|
||
|
Anyone know anything about United Fuel?
Recently went on a trip to Forster in NSW and filled up at one for fair cheap but then when we actually got to Forster went in to find another United station offering unleaded (not E10) for 107.5 the whole week (ie no cheap tuesday) when everyone else in town was 119.9 etc However the United only 1 or 2 cars in it every time I saw it...made me wonder if there was a reason it was so cheap..?
_________________ 1997 EL Falcon XR6 Sedan |
||
| Top | |
||
| data_mine |
|
|||
|
skidder wrote: Yep, I use 98 octane in my stock engine/tuned car and noticed an extra 400km per tank I don't know if you're poking fun at me or not, but either way, here's a independently commissioned report covering race fuels, 98RON, 95RON, and some ethanol blended fuels for performance. http://canberracruises.com/Maclean/Midd ... nFuels.pdf I'll save you reading the whole lot, here's the conclusion. Quote: BEST POWER
It can be concluded clearly by the data that if your budget was unlimited then ELF Turbomax would be your choice. Economically for power, the ethanol blend must be considered. If you wish not to use Ethanol blends then Caltex Vortex 98 is the best solution of the 98 ron fuels. WHY Clearly the best performers in their class all had high content of oxygenates, refer to discussion. ECONOMICAL ASSUMPTION If your car was a daily driver then Caltex Vortex 98 would be a wise choice as it is yet to be proven if the (Park Petroleum) ethanol blend is economically fuel efficient. It is worth noting though that on a budget the ethanol blend fuel is clearly well worth it. (For power) CONSTANT PERFORMANCE Another point worth noting what is not evident in the test is the way the fuel reacts to tuning. For example ELF Turbomax and LMS certainly sustained more power after successive power runs, (when engine heat build up occurs). No other fuel was as consistent. Sunoco would be a close second in this category. Martini and other fuels were not tested, nor have been used as much by MRT to confidently give a opinion.
_________________ 1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, 302W, stereo, slow |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| skidder |
|
|||
|
data_mine wrote: skidder wrote: Yep, I use 98 octane in my stock engine/tuned car and noticed an extra 400km per tank I don't know if you're poking fun at me or not, but either way, here's a independently commissioned report covering race fuels, 98RON, 95RON, and some ethanol blended fuels for performance. No, wasn't aimed at you....hahahaha, i just realised in my tired state i wrote tuned instead of untuned  (was aimed any who have or are going to try and justify the extra cost of using 98 octane in a stocko i6's not tuned for it against the km's gained).On a side note in reference to your article, ethanol fuels can be great for performance, but if using them you really want to take advantage of compression/tuning as ethanol has lower volumetric energy density than regular petrol.
_________________ EVL098 wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| cjh |
|
|||
|
My ED pings on Shell, but not on BP......go figure???.....so I use BP.
_________________ http://youtu.be/jJTh9F3Vgg0 |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests |
