|
AU99 |
|
|||
|
Strange things do happen, sometimes it can just be a freak kinda thing. do the same combo in one motor and it wont do the same things to another. While it does seem unreal that this "freak" motor is pulling the numbers, it is plauseable.
I had a 253 V8 Auto commy dead stock that used to run rings around most 308's. could never understand it but thats just the way that motor was. Have seen EF-EL's pull 95 kw on the dyno and yet others 115 and yet they are stock and yet they are the same motor physically, why then the difference? they are all mass produced parts all fitted in a factory. I just put it down to lifes little mysteries, some things are just unexplained. how many times have you said to yourself it should pull better numbers than that? and other times holy crap didnt think I'd get that much. Sometimes you do everyting right and still...... and others just throw it all together and hey bingo!!!.. some people are just dam lucky.
_________________ 2003 BA Falcon Egas Taxi Pack - XR Replica |
|||
Top | |
fritzz |
|
|||
|
well if it run a over 96mph last time with out the new stuff then, its going to pick up a couple mph.
Grechie how manny rwkw did u have then it ran the 14.4@96??
_________________ # 1997 EL Falcon GLI - 600+rwkw |
|||
Top | |
Steady ED |
|
|||
|
I've never seen a car with a stock 91AA head pull that much, I don't think I ever will either.
_________________ ED XR8 Sprint - S-Trim, V500, 249rwkw |
|||
Top | |
FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
fritzz wrote: Grechie how manny rwkw did u have then it ran the 14.4@96?? I think it was 150rwkw. |
||
Top | |
old_mate |
|
|||
|
f**k. I'd be willing to throw money at this bloke to pull the f**k motor down in front of half you whinging bastards and have some pics taken just to shut you up.
This car has always run well, 170+rwkw is a very good acheivement in my books, it cost a s**t load less than a DEV 5 and is so simple, if it breaks it can be repeated. I doubt it'll crack a 13, but would gladly be proven otherwise. I suspect it'll need a T5Z at least before long, and some diff gears (ala OED666)
_________________ too many rabbits in china |
|||
Top | |
tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
old_mate wrote: f**k. I'd be willing to throw money at this bloke to pull the f**k motor down in front of half you whinging bastards and have some pics taken just to shut you up.
This car has always run well, 170+rwkw is a very good acheivement in my books, it cost a s**t load less than a DEV 5 and is so simple, if it breaks it can be repeated. I doubt it'll crack a 13, but would gladly be proven otherwise. I suspect it'll need a T5Z at least before long, and some diff gears (ala OED666) yeah 170 plus is good, his engine just doesn't make it. THE HEAD DOES NOT FLOW ENOUGH AIR FULL STOP, it's just not posible for an un ported falcon head to make that much power. there is no proof of it, just a dyno sheet, it doens't mater what dyno or how much the heads been shaved. If the head can't flow the air, the engine can't make the power. if it could be done that easy every one would have it, and the people spending big dollars would be getting 220plus.. if this engine is so good, take it to strip and run the MPH to prove it. from the power he claims and the weight of the car he should be able run over 103MPH.(and thats being kind) if he does it i'll stand (sit) here and aet my words for all to see. but untill then he's full of s**t or the dyno operator is blowing wind up his a*** |
||
Top | |
Grechie |
|
||
|
dude, theres a guy on AFF, with a unichip and that, on a stock head, pulling 176rwkw, so wot are you smoking ? is his result wrong as well?
also, it for flying f**k sake, it got 174 with no filter or piping how many times must i say it, and bonnet up!, with pod and pipe on, it got 169.9rwkw, when the time is right ill give it a shot,, but im not saying bow down to me for f**k sake.
_________________ Ford Falcon EA Naturally Aspirated 4.0L i6 |
||
Top | |
Damo |
|
|||
|
Who got 176 rwkw with a stock head ?
|
|||
Top | |
Dansedgli |
|
||
|
Heljas?
|
||
Top | |
EL XR8 |
|
|||
|
Ahh, so thats why he cut up so rough, when i asked questions about other NA6's times. He has one too... hahaha
|
|||
Top | |
sikford |
|
|||
|
ok i havn't read all of this post but i ran my car up on a dynamics dyno the other day and as long as the correction factro is set up the same on the dyno you should get an accurate result.i was runnin it with the standard 0.96 somethin somethin and got 133.2 at the tyres.if you are at a dyno day and you look at the correction factor it will be around the 2 point something mark(or there abouts). which in term puts the reading up a bit.ill run it at the dyno day and ill most likely get a few extra rwkw because of that.
_________________ THE Fairmont Ghia : 75th Anniversary LE |
|||
Top | |
FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
The air & inlet temps must be the same or very close or the dyno will give you overinflated corrected figures.
|
||
Top | |
tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
Grechie wrote: dude, theres a guy on AFF, with a unichip and that, on a stock head, pulling 176rwkw, so wot are you smoking ? is his result wrong as well?
also, it for flying f**k sake, it got 174 with no filter or piping how many times must i say it, and bonnet up!, with pod and pipe on, it got 169.9rwkw, when the time is right ill give it a shot,, but im not saying bow down to me for f**k sake. yes his is wrong. it doesn't take much to realise the s**t power numbers when you look at the head flow numbers of any stock I6 head. like i said i'll believe you when you runs the right MPH |
||
Top | |
Steady ED |
|
|||
|
Dansedgli wrote: Heljas?
How many wastegates?
_________________ ED XR8 Sprint - S-Trim, V500, 249rwkw |
|||
Top | |
old_mate |
|
|||
|
wastegates
if he runs only 170 odd rwkw with a snail his car is seriously retarted. how many MPH are we expecting from the knockers?
_________________ too many rabbits in china |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests |