|
| DRHEMI |
|
|||
|
Yeah I am running a WPN Head EFFalcon, i have a restricter in my exhaust and my car is auto....
We all know Auto and Stallie = loss of rwkw I aint even trying and I got 175.1rwkw with Dyno Sheet to Proove it even though my AFR's are all over the place Stock bottom end, just rebuilt with the same 300,000klms Cast Pistons........its all there in plain view what I have done to my car in my build thread on AFF, none of this secret squirell stuff or $4,000 Black Bottom End lol Here is the link if you doubt me http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11227304 We will see what times my car runs at the AFF drag day 
_________________ PROEF 13.46 @ 105.78mph - 1994 Ford Fairmont EF NA 6cyl Man 3.9 diff Sedan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
kinda missed the point we were trying to make there didnt you? lol
but yes, will be interesting to see what time you run
_________________ XG Panelvan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| DRHEMI |
|
|||
|
misk_one wrote: kinda missed the point we were trying to make there didnt you? lol Nah I just didnt reply as didnt want to go around in circles with what factors go into making a good 1/4 mile misk_one wrote: but yes, will be interesting to see what time you run Autos are faster so see what happens lol
_________________ PROEF 13.46 @ 105.78mph - 1994 Ford Fairmont EF NA 6cyl Man 3.9 diff Sedan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
fair call.
_________________ XG Panelvan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| 67RCE |
|
||
|
DRHEMI wrote: misk_one wrote: kinda missed the point we were trying to make there didnt you? lol Nah I just didnt reply as didnt want to go around in circles with what factors go into making a good 1/4 mile misk_one wrote: but yes, will be interesting to see what time you run Autos are faster so see what happens lolI'm yet to see an BTR Auto E series into the 13's. There are a few manuals there. Also, I don't trust Dyno sheets, as they can be made to read high.
_________________ ILL60 - EF XR8, Sunroof, Ticky Kit, 19x8.5/19x11 TE37's, 347, AFr185's, TFS BoxRcustom converter, Hurst Quarterstick, huge billet cam. |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
67RCE wrote: tickford_6 wrote: Dansedgli wrote: Is he Swanny? The guy who tuned my car from Bullet Performance Racing said he had a bloke in there called Swanny that made nearly 200rwkw with an NA E series Falcon. He said it was s**t to drive and had a fairly short powerband but it made good power. Pretty impressive seeing as I only made that with 5psi. He said it was s**t to drive and had a fairly short powerband but it made good power. That leans towards to much camshaft to compensate for lake of port flow. a good head will need less camshaft and will have a good power spread. and from what I have seen, with a good cam, headwork isn't required while staying N/A. Power on a Dyno is one thing, driveability is another. OED666 has the perfect example of that. 165rwkw, 13.8@101mph. There are cars with more power that are significantly slower. I can name one forum member who made 175rwkw but can only manage a 14.2, another made 225rwkw turbo'd and ran a 13.7.... stating times doesn't prove a thing. tell me how heavy the cars were and what MPH they did, THEN we can start comparing things. |
||
| Top | |
||
| 67RCE |
|
||
|
tickford_6 wrote: 67RCE wrote: tickford_6 wrote: Dansedgli wrote: Is he Swanny? The guy who tuned my car from Bullet Performance Racing said he had a bloke in there called Swanny that made nearly 200rwkw with an NA E series Falcon. He said it was s**t to drive and had a fairly short powerband but it made good power. Pretty impressive seeing as I only made that with 5psi. He said it was s**t to drive and had a fairly short powerband but it made good power. That leans towards to much camshaft to compensate for lake of port flow. a good head will need less camshaft and will have a good power spread. and from what I have seen, with a good cam, headwork isn't required while staying N/A. Power on a Dyno is one thing, driveability is another. OED666 has the perfect example of that. 165rwkw, 13.8@101mph. There are cars with more power that are significantly slower. I can name one forum member who made 175rwkw but can only manage a 14.2, another made 225rwkw turbo'd and ran a 13.7.... stating times doesn't prove a thing. tell me how heavy the cars were and what MPH they did, THEN we can start comparing things. OED - 1640kg - 101mph. 165rwkw Turbodrift - 1650kg - 100mph. 185rwkw BrockyB8 - 1650kg, 99mph. 183rwkw
_________________ ILL60 - EF XR8, Sunroof, Ticky Kit, 19x8.5/19x11 TE37's, 347, AFr185's, TFS BoxRcustom converter, Hurst Quarterstick, huge billet cam. |
||
| Top | |
||
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
lol
*waits for another excuse*
_________________ XG Panelvan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EFFalcon |
|
|||
|
are they legit weights though, or estimates?
_________________ FALCN6 - EF GLi Turbo, 20" Rims, Air Bag Suspension, Straight LPG, 225rwkw |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
i think it all just comes down to car setup and driver skill.
obviously some are better than others. 20rwkw isnt much difference when you give or take the fact that no one dyno reading will be the same and 2 drivers even driving the same car will get different times unless they're both very switched on...
_________________ XG Panelvan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| MMD |
|
||
|
How much do the heads cost ?
|
||
| Top | |
||
| GeZza200 |
|
||
|
thats what im trying to work out
_________________ EL Futura: CVE head, Wolf V500, ICE Ignition and Coil, 36lb injectors, Walbro 255lb, Paci comps, 3" exhaust, T5, Harrop Truetrac with 3.9s. Now with 198.9rwkw, (~185rwkw and 13.80 @99.1mph) with more power to come |
||
| Top | |
||
| needfordspeed |
|
||
|
67RCE wrote: DRHEMI wrote: misk_one wrote: kinda missed the point we were trying to make there didnt you? lol Nah I just didnt reply as didnt want to go around in circles with what factors go into making a good 1/4 mile misk_one wrote: but yes, will be interesting to see what time you run Autos are faster so see what happens lolI'm yet to see an BTR Auto E series into the 13's. There are a few manuals there. Also, I don't trust Dyno sheets, as they can be made to read high. There was a video on boosted a while back of a EF/EL with BTR and 3700 stall running a 13.7 NA.
_________________ 1988 EA S-Pack|MPI|LSD|AIT turbo manifold|Garrett GT3540|3" Exhaust turbo back|Resprayed|microtech LT8s|60lb Injectors|Bosch 044 with surge tank|3000 RPM stall|Ported AU head|Wade turbo cam|Crow double valve springs|1.3mm MLS headgasket|C4 conversion|Built bottom end|10.6@125MPHi |
||
| Top | |
||
| DRHEMI |
|
|||
|
67RCE wrote: OED - 1640kg - 101mph. 165rwkw Where did you get those figures from - my rego sticker says 1450 tare? or did they weigh them on a weig bridge as stock yeah 1450 but with my stereo prob another 200kgTurbodrift - 1650kg - 100mph. 185rwkw BrockyB8 - 1650kg, 99mph. 183rwkw needfordspeed wrote: There was a video on boosted a while back of a EF/EL with BTR and 3700 stall running a 13.7 NA. Post it up Isn't that then the fastest eseries na 6cyl? as is current on your Boosted Forum 1/4 Times ? 13.797 @ 157.3km/h EA Fairmont N/A 6 Cyl 4.0L --------- Grechie 13.82 @99.67mph - ED Futura N/A ---------- OED666 13.98 @99.51mph EA Brock Falcon N/A---------Turbodrift
_________________ PROEF 13.46 @ 105.78mph - 1994 Ford Fairmont EF NA 6cyl Man 3.9 diff Sedan |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| xcabbi |
|
||
|
Is the tare weight the dry weight or wet weight but with half a tank of fuel?
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 122 guests |
