|
Waggin |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: To take a completely different direction... I think the for sale section needs defining. I like what FF has. Cars for sale, parts for sale, non car related s**t. JMHO. There are things in the pipeline for the for sale and wanted sections. It wont be like what FF has (i dont think - i dont even know what they have. lol).
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: ive got the same problem as RD, in threads with big pictures, the text is pushed off to the side and i cant read it all lol Yep yep.. resize the images for now. As it is the images are being cut off, so they should be resized anyway
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
racedirector |
|
|||
Age: 63 Posts: 1584 Joined: 20th Mar 2005 Ride: EDL Fairmont Wagon/AU XR8 Ghia Location: Riverstone |
{USERNAME} wrote: Just for reference, what image size worked for you? Ok, no probs on the image stuff, I knew there is alot of things you could do with images, must have been something else I was thinking of re sizing them. Not sure what size "works" just yet, I am about to post with images set at 720 to see what happens. What is the available area within the post block for everything (minus margins)? Cheers RD
_________________ =1994 ED Wagon GLi body/EL Fairmont spec with *ALL* EL running gear.= |
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: What is the available area within the post block for everything (minus margins)? Not sure.. I was being lazy and asking you what size worked
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
Is there any reason you dont upload an attachment on Fordmods? It would certainly overcome the image sizing problems...
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
racedirector |
|
|||
Age: 63 Posts: 1584 Joined: 20th Mar 2005 Ride: EDL Fairmont Wagon/AU XR8 Ghia Location: Riverstone |
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: What is the available area within the post block for everything (minus margins)? Not sure.. I was being lazy and asking you what size worked LOL! I know how you feel, been there, done that I just posted with images set at 720px width and all seems fine. See? viewtopic.php?f=53&t=65695&p=944345#p944345 Cheers RD
_________________ =1994 ED Wagon GLi body/EL Fairmont spec with *ALL* EL running gear.= |
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: I just posted with images set at 720px width and all seems fine. See? viewtopic.php?f=53&t=65695&p=944345#p944345 Cheers RD Yep, looks fine. 720px wide it is!
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
racedirector |
|
|||
Age: 63 Posts: 1584 Joined: 20th Mar 2005 Ride: EDL Fairmont Wagon/AU XR8 Ghia Location: Riverstone |
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: I just posted with images set at 720px width and all seems fine. See? viewtopic.php?f=53&t=65695&p=944345#p944345 Cheers RD Yep, looks fine. 720px wide it is! Yay! I have set a standard for FordMods. Now everone will be cursing me
_________________ =1994 ED Wagon GLi body/EL Fairmont spec with *ALL* EL running gear.= |
|||
Top | |
racedirector |
|
|||
Age: 63 Posts: 1584 Joined: 20th Mar 2005 Ride: EDL Fairmont Wagon/AU XR8 Ghia Location: Riverstone |
{USERNAME} wrote: Is there any reason you dont upload an attachment on Fordmods? It would certainly overcome the image sizing problems... Because you can't put them inline with the text... I think
_________________ =1994 ED Wagon GLi body/EL Fairmont spec with *ALL* EL running gear.= |
|||
Top | |
data_mine |
|
|||
|
Another horrible side affect from fixing the sites width. I mean come on, 800wide is a pretty darn standard picture size, and we can't use it. I've standardised on it as have many. And you can't expect everyone to make use of the attachment feature, as I've got an extensive gallery already built up on photobucket that's used across all forums I frequent. I wouldn't be happy to upload all said pics again to FM. Plus it's extra bandwidth FM has to pay for, surely you'd be somewhat happier to have externally posted pics?
FM3 is looking more and more a dud. I'm all for change where improvement is to be had, but so far we've got a somewhat snappier site (yay there), but at a significant cost to usability. I hate being negative, but that's how I'm seeing it.
_________________ 1998 DL LTD in Sparkling Burgundy, daily, 302W, stereo, slow |
|||
Top | |
data_mine |
|
|||
|
||||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: Is there any reason you dont upload an attachment on Fordmods? It would certainly overcome the image sizing problems... Because you can't put them inline with the text... I think Yes, you can now.
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: surely you'd be somewhat happier to have externally posted pics? No, we have more control over uploaded pics. They dont go missing, and they're all thumbnailed with an option to click through to the full size so there is never any concerns about the size of your photo. Even if we extended to full screen, what may fit on your screen as a 1024x768 image, may cause many other people to scroll affecting any chance of us using absolute positioned div's and ultimately most of the upcoming applications for Fordmods.
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
It's also worth noting that only 2.1% of posts contain a linked image and only 3.4% of users have ever used an external linked image. Surely people can use the upload feature, especially now that inline image placement is supported!
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
fiend |
|
|||
|
Now, I am going to get into trouble again, but I am not going to read this whole thread and am simply going to ask for the ability to either have a signature, or not have a signature, returned.
On my own thread, or threads where I have posted recently, I see no need for my signature to be repeated all bloody day, but I didn't want to delete my signature entirely. ON the point regarding large images.... I have one screen set at around 1800 pixels wide, and the other screen at a more modest 1200. Having the two screens is a good thing for reasons that go beyond simply "looking cool for the mates kids". I used to like FordMods as it filled the whole screen width and therefore I didn't have to scroll up and down so much. By limiting the table width to a low rez, you may have helped out those old timers with 800x600 VGA screens, but for the rest of us you are now wasting almost half the screen. |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |