Fordmods Logo

A decent Launch / Take off 

 

Page 2 of 2 [ 27 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2

 
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:17 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 35

Posts: 4316

Joined: 30th Oct 2006

Gallery: 18 images

Ride: Envi EF

Location: Grafton
NSW, Australia

I think the 3 litre version would be crapper than the 3.9, champ.

 

_________________

>>>EF Futura T build<<<

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:23 pm 
Parts Gopher
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 75

Joined: 6th Nov 2007

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: BA Fairmont V8

Location: Perth
WA, Australia

krisisdog wrote:
I think the 3 litre version would be crapper than the 3.9, champ.


what falcon had the 3L??

 

_________________

02 BA Fairmont Ghia-- 24v 5.4L, Dumped, 18' Advanti's, Cold Air, 20% Tint

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:24 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 35

Posts: 4316

Joined: 30th Oct 2006

Gallery: 18 images

Ride: Envi EF

Location: Grafton
NSW, Australia

EAs could have a 3.2L.

 

_________________

>>>EF Futura T build<<<

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:24 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 36

Posts: 638

Joined: 16th Feb 2005

Ride: EA Turbo

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

I think he was meaning 3.2L

 

_________________

1988 EA S-Pack|MPI|LSD|AIT turbo manifold|Garrett GT3540|3" Exhaust turbo back|Resprayed|microtech LT8s|60lb Injectors|Bosch 044 with surge tank|3000 RPM stall|Ported AU head|Wade turbo cam|Crow double valve springs|1.3mm MLS headgasket|C4 conversion|Built bottom end|10.6@125MPHi

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:25 pm 
Fordmods Junkie
Offline
User avatar

Posts: 11752

Joined: 17th May 2005

Gallery: 11 images

Ride: EL Fairmont, VFR400 racer

Power: 144 rwkw

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

02tonna wrote:
rack off. its a well known fact that the 3.9L was the crappest motor ford produced. i should know i had a eb 3.9L. what im sayin is if you want a better take off get a 4.0L.. note the 2 guys that cracked it both own crappy 3.9L's. maybe this is the reason there ragging because of what i said.


Froudey wrote:
02tonna wrote:
just sell it and buy a ba or atleast a 4.0L EB


wtf this a old topic i have since fixed it... it was human related...


As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.

Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.

phong =P~

 

_________________

phongus = Post whore 2006
EL XR6 motor, EL ECU + J3 chip, WADE 1673 Camshaft, 3" S/S intake, Pacy 4480, 2.5" Hi flow cat, 2.5" Lukey exhaust.
Max Power = 144.6 rwkw (03/05/2008)

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 5:50 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 42

Posts: 850

Joined: 10th Nov 2004

Gallery: 20 images

Ride: 03 BA Fairmont

Location: Forest Lake
QLD, Australia

well i have had an early 3.9 CFI that would always overheat etc.
my current eb is 3.9 Multipoint and i gotta say it goes pretty hard...

 

_________________

Regards,
Punnisher_42
_____________
2003 BA Fairmont - Stock standard
1994 U13 cough Nissan Cough Bluebird

Favorite Quotes:
"Sportwagon = homo-erotic wank-fest." - downingj

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 7:35 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Age: 40

Posts: 6746

Joined: 13th Mar 2006

Gallery: 10 images

Ride: SF5 Forester

Location: Bathurst
NSW, Australia

02tonna wrote:
rack off. its a well known fact that the 3.9L was the crappest motor ford produced. i should know i had a eb 3.9L. what im sayin is if you want a better take off get a 4.0L.. note the 2 guys that cracked it both own crappy 3.9L's. maybe this is the reason there ragging because of what i said.


really this is just getting retarded... you are talking about an engine that let's face it is 20 YEARS OLD....

if i owned a BA or AU or even a ED people wouldn't say stupid s**t... even if i owned a BA or post EA motored car i would of had the same problem from my techniquie being sloppy (prior to now)

queastion how many cc difference is there from an au block not many is there.... the 3.9 has alot of potential when money is put into.....


Mods just lock this thread it is an old topic.... and getting silly

 

_________________

R.I.P Tobias my son.

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:20 pm 
Parts Gopher
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 75

Joined: 6th Nov 2007

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: BA Fairmont V8

Location: Perth
WA, Australia

phongus wrote:

As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.

Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.

phong =P~


true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up.

 

_________________

02 BA Fairmont Ghia-- 24v 5.4L, Dumped, 18' Advanti's, Cold Air, 20% Tint

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:24 pm 
Parts Gopher
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 75

Joined: 6th Nov 2007

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: BA Fairmont V8

Location: Perth
WA, Australia

Froudey wrote:
02tonna wrote:
rack off. its a well known fact that the 3.9L was the crappest motor ford produced. i should know i had a eb 3.9L. what im sayin is if you want a better take off get a 4.0L.. note the 2 guys that cracked it both own crappy 3.9L's. maybe this is the reason there ragging because of what i said.


really this is just getting retarded... you are talking about an engine that let's face it is 20 YEARS OLD....

if i owned a BA or AU or even a ED people wouldn't say stupid s**t... even if i owned a BA or post EA motored car i would of had the same problem from my techniquie being sloppy (prior to now)

queastion how many cc difference is there from an au block not many is there.... the 3.9 has alot of potential when money is put into.....


Mods just lock this thread it is an old topic.... and getting silly



sorry didnt see the next page...... each to there own i like my 5.4 u like your 3.9 who cares topic over

 

_________________

02 BA Fairmont Ghia-- 24v 5.4L, Dumped, 18' Advanti's, Cold Air, 20% Tint

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:27 pm 
Fordmods Junkie
Offline
User avatar

Posts: 11752

Joined: 17th May 2005

Gallery: 11 images

Ride: EL Fairmont, VFR400 racer

Power: 144 rwkw

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

02tonna wrote:
phongus wrote:

As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.

Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.

phong =P~


true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up.


We like smiley faces when it comes to jokes :D. They make the comment a happy place. :P :lol:

phong =P~

 

_________________

phongus = Post whore 2006
EL XR6 motor, EL ECU + J3 chip, WADE 1673 Camshaft, 3" S/S intake, Pacy 4480, 2.5" Hi flow cat, 2.5" Lukey exhaust.
Max Power = 144.6 rwkw (03/05/2008)

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:33 pm 
Parts Gopher
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 75

Joined: 6th Nov 2007

Gallery: 4 images

Ride: BA Fairmont V8

Location: Perth
WA, Australia

phongus wrote:
02tonna wrote:
phongus wrote:

As you can see, he said it was a human related issue. I believe the 3.9L was the better engine out of the 3.2L and 4.1L from the previous models. Not to mention the 4.0L was probably came about due to the 3.9L.

Anyways topic is over now since the problem had been solved.

phong =P~


true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up.


We like smiley faces when it comes to jokes :D. They make the comment a happy place. :P :lol:

phong =P~

cool thanks for the info.. and congrats on hitting 8000 posts :D

 

_________________

02 BA Fairmont Ghia-- 24v 5.4L, Dumped, 18' Advanti's, Cold Air, 20% Tint

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:38 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 35

Posts: 4316

Joined: 30th Oct 2006

Gallery: 18 images

Ride: Envi EF

Location: Grafton
NSW, Australia

02tonna wrote:

true the 4.0 would have evolved from the 3.9 but because it was the first motor to be fuel injected (i think) it was a trial for the better motor. it was a motor to get the kinks out. sorry to drift off topic but i was just making a joke and some people got offended so they just need to liten up.


Just fyi, the 4.1 had the option of efi from XE on.

 

_________________

>>>EF Futura T build<<<

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:
Sort by  
 Page 2 of 2  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

 

 

It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 11:34 pm All times are UTC + 11 hours

 

 

(c)2014 Total Web Solutions Australia - Australian Web Hosting and Domain Names