|
mystro |
|
||
|
hypothetically raced a base model lancer 2nd newest model looked /sounded to be stock in my ba 6 auto in performance ,ute stock pristine condition on undisclosed 3 lane dead flat new piece of concrete .
got a great start and maintained 1 to 1.5 car lead flat to tha floor to bout 140-145 when said lancer munched me by bout 3 lenghts and continued pulling away till i hypothetically hit speed limiter wtf!!. does ne 1 have any quarter time /speed for an auto ba ute?i dont thats why i am asking |
||
Top | |
GeZza200 |
|
||
|
I can tell you now that lancer was not stock becuase they are not quick at all and would not be able to catch a 6 after 100k's
_________________ EL Futura: CVE head, Wolf V500, ICE Ignition and Coil, 36lb injectors, Walbro 255lb, Paci comps, 3" exhaust, T5, Harrop Truetrac with 3.9s. Now with 198.9rwkw, (~185rwkw and 13.80 @99.1mph) with more power to come |
||
Top | |
Steady ED |
|
|||
|
Stock BA auto sedans seem to be around mid-high 15s.
Utes wouldn't be far off. I suspect boost if he reeled you in at stomped you at 140.
_________________ ED XR8 Sprint - S-Trim, V500, 249rwkw |
|||
Top | |
fnp |
|
|||
Age: 39 Posts: 4401 Joined: 25th Mar 2005 Ride: BA XT, BA XR6T, ED Ghia 5.0 Location: Perth |
Quote: pretty sure a 06 lancer will beat a stock auto ba
No, it won't.
_________________ What's the difference between a Holden and a sheep? It's less embarrasing getting out of the back of a sheep.. |
|||
Top | |
au man |
|
|||
|
I wouldn't think that it would maybe off the line if it was manual and they knew how to drive but after that i very much doubt it.
|
|||
Top | |
mystro |
|
||
|
boost maybe, didnt hear a blow of and had stock lookin zorst it was no evo or vrx,i s**t you not i couldnt belive it just keep pulling away and away till i had to give up ,nitrous maybe
|
||
Top | |
GeZza200 |
|
||
|
well a stock 2006 lancer has a wopping 89kw, so it was turbod, supercharged or Nitrous. Or your car is absolutey rooted
_________________ EL Futura: CVE head, Wolf V500, ICE Ignition and Coil, 36lb injectors, Walbro 255lb, Paci comps, 3" exhaust, T5, Harrop Truetrac with 3.9s. Now with 198.9rwkw, (~185rwkw and 13.80 @99.1mph) with more power to come |
||
Top | |
Froudey |
|
||
|
i think back to top gear were they put a lancer and a nimbus both in 5 and drove down the air strip and the nimbus like was 1 minute in front at the end
_________________ R.I.P Tobias my son. |
||
Top | |
mystro |
|
||
|
GeZza200 wrote: well a stock 2006 lancer has a wopping 89kw, so it was turbod, supercharged or Nitrous. Or your car is absolutey rooted my car is perfect ,89kw is s**t for a 2.4 aye.i am not tryin to spin crap either.i dont like gettin beat specially by a s**t.
ive had st162 2l celicas n/a modifications(everything) that pull right up to 190-5 and do over tha 200 mark(210 down very big hill).ate el'z an vs commonwhores and some older v8s ,got murdered by gen3'z though,never raced an xr .kept up wif a few turbo subbies aswell nos would give the guy 100-150 more horses right?reckon it be nough to eat my ute ?i thinkin must have had some big boost and a plumback or sumtin and hit boost in 4th or likley 5th se yer ba he only had to hold the speed for 30secs before i had to slow for my exit |
||
Top | |
mystro |
|
||
|
prolly should change the headin to mutant lancer sleeper flogs stock ba ute
|
||
Top | |
mystro |
|
||
|
been lookin around the net and a stock evo is good for low 15s,so rice lancer+evo eng+boost=ba for lunch
|
||
Top | |
fnp |
|
|||
Age: 39 Posts: 4401 Joined: 25th Mar 2005 Ride: BA XT, BA XR6T, ED Ghia 5.0 Location: Perth |
wtf are you on, an evo will do way faster then low 15's, but an evo is completely different from pov pack lancers.
Is it just me or are 80% of the really stupid posts from newbies with less then 50 posts or so.
_________________ What's the difference between a Holden and a sheep? It's less embarrasing getting out of the back of a sheep.. |
|||
Top | |
GeZza200 |
|
||
|
mystro wrote: GeZza200 wrote: well a stock 2006 lancer has a wopping 89kw, so it was turbod, supercharged or Nitrous. Or your car is absolutey rooted my car is perfect ,89kw is s**t for a 2.4 aye.i am not tryin to spin crap either.i dont like gettin beat specially by a s**t.ive had st162 2l celicas n/a modifications(everything) that pull right up to 190-5 and do over tha 200 mark(210 down very big hill).ate el'z an vs commonwhores and some older v8s ,got murdered by gen3'z though,never raced an xr .kept up wif a few turbo subbies aswell nos would give the guy 100-150 more horses right?reckon it be nough to eat my ute ?i thinkin must have had some big boost and a plumback or sumtin and hit boost in 4th or likley 5th se yer ba he only had to hold the speed for 30secs before i had to slow for my exit I doubt he would a 100 or 150hp shot of nos it would blow the buzz box to bits if it was stock internals. I really think he had it turboed ,maybe a 50hp shot of nos. But i dont no anyone that uses nos
_________________ EL Futura: CVE head, Wolf V500, ICE Ignition and Coil, 36lb injectors, Walbro 255lb, Paci comps, 3" exhaust, T5, Harrop Truetrac with 3.9s. Now with 198.9rwkw, (~185rwkw and 13.80 @99.1mph) with more power to come |
||
Top | |
GeZza200 |
|
||
|
mystro wrote: been lookin around the net and a stock evo is good for low 15s,so rice lancer+evo eng+boost=ba for lunch
I thought evos were good for low 13's high 12's, those things hammer
_________________ EL Futura: CVE head, Wolf V500, ICE Ignition and Coil, 36lb injectors, Walbro 255lb, Paci comps, 3" exhaust, T5, Harrop Truetrac with 3.9s. Now with 198.9rwkw, (~185rwkw and 13.80 @99.1mph) with more power to come |
||
Top | |
au man |
|
|||
|
GeZza200 wrote: mystro wrote: been lookin around the net and a stock evo is good for low 15s,so rice lancer+evo eng+boost=ba for lunch I thought evos were good for low 13's high 12's, those things hammer Yea thats what i was thinking they are like WRX's |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests |