|
| Hybrid34 |
|
||
|
Most def had some speical fried kind of rice under the hood,....
I could understand it being a tad quicker off the line as it would be lighter manual so forth but as soon as you hit 2nd u'd eat it (assuming its stock), and over 100kms?....you'd beat it top end if it were stock for sure.. ^ Im under 50posts and that ain't stupid newbie sh!t..
_________________ Sucessful trades with Schmee, Braidy, Niko, The_Ghost, YBHVE4, Stalker
|
||
| Top | |
||
| mystro |
|
||
|
i dont no ne1 who uses nos either or much about it ,lancer looked stock like my girl friends mums,badges ect beat my ba .as for evo specs iwas reading about the fast and furious evo 8 nearly stock 15.3sec quartermileand a few other sites around that to i admit that i only read the headings though.plus the whole newb fing id rather drive my fords than talk bout them so far i have owned 2x xf's ,ef,el surplus police chaser,au futura,au fairmont,auxr6 now i have a ba station wagon a ba ute and a el im doin up for my girl, only posting cause im bored waitin for my mechanic to finish install of my evoford3 nolathane kit on the el.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| fordfreak ef |
|
|||
|
possibly a stealth sleepr lancer with a turbo installed... an evo is much faster than 15's.. a stock lancer with no mods would not hold a candle to a ba falcon over 100km/h... unless worked ofcourse..
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| krisisdog |
|
|||
|
Hybrid34 wrote: Most def had some speical fried kind of rice under the hood,....
+1 |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| smiley235 |
|
|||
|
if anything, the lancer might get a jump on you but you'll leave it for dead at higher speeds (20km/h+) . That car must have been modded and forced, or have been an evo.
_________________ 178.3 rwkw
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| au man |
|
|||
|
smiley235 wrote: if anything, the lancer might get a jump on you but you'll leave it for dead at higher speeds (20km/h+) . That car must have been modded and forced, or have been an evo.
I think a lil more then 20km/h. I was in my dads manual fiesta and i had my mate in his AU I6 to 70 Km/h when i backed off. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| mystro |
|
||
|
a newer top end hilux than my previous au xr6 manual extractor,zorst kept right up with me from 80 right to 180 once. we both had to back off cause 2 lanes became 1.but it wasnt from a standing start like the lancer and he floored it first.
has ne 1 raced a vx or vz 6 in their ba 6 on the strip? ive found the ba quiker off the mark but never got to try top end , 
|
||
| Top | |
||
| FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
Yeah i race heaps of cars and put my foot flat to the floor till im doing ridiculous top speeds just to see if i can beat a fukin stock lancer & hilux.
Who cares about killing myself or others coming the other way, i just want to risk everyones life so i can see if im in front at 180kp/h and be able to brag that i beat a stock lancer or bombadore with my stock BA 
|
||
| Top | |
||
| mystro |
|
||
|
FordFairmont wrote: Yeah i race heaps of cars and put my foot flat to the floor till im doing ridiculous top speeds just to see if i can beat a fukin stock lancer & hilux. yeah your exactly right iama fool prolly why ive been threw so many cars, also would be some scary s**t sum1 comin down the wrong direction of a drag strip,and even if they were illeagal drags i doubt people would be able tah cause they would have to cross a river to do so bypass friends with uhf blockin entrance and turn off there headlights half a kay away
Who cares about killing myself or others coming the other way, i just want to risk everyones life so i can see if im in front at 180kp/h and be able to brag that i beat a stock lancer or bombadore with my stock BA |
||
| Top | |
||
| FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
Fair enough, just thought i'd rant on about s**t, cause it looks like its a frequent occurance for you and 180kp/h races with cars that pretty much arent built to handle very well at those speeds.
Hope your car is in xcellent shape cause if somethings gonna give, its gona be at those speeds..... I remember once in an old XD my mate was doing 180kph for a few minutes just to be an idiot, and the next day the front tyre blew at 70kph. Lucky that it blew at a relatively low speed as opposed to the day before. Plus the tyre was in perfect condition as far as we knew.... you just cant account for those things. Take it easy......cheers!!! |
||
| Top | |
||
| 4dlvr |
|
||
|
this is a stupid thread.
stock lancer 0-100km/h round 9.5-10s 0-400m would be 17ish where as even a taxi ba should do 0-100 in 8sec and 0-400m in 16secs. in conclusion either 1)yourve just made up a big lie for some stupid reason or 2)it was modded up made to look like a sleeper or 3)your car is f#*kd and you cant drive ill leave it for you to decide which option to belive
_________________ 96 EF FAIRMONT |
||
| Top | |
||
| neilb |
|
||
|
agree with the above, bet there are a few stains on some peoples computers or keyboards,
jesus this is lame.
|
||
| Top | |
||
| krisisdog |
|
|||
|
Just to note - the 2.4 Lancer has 115kw, not 89 as mentioned before
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| xpression |
|
|||
|
even the 2L was around 100kw
i owned one for a while and it was pretty good but not BA beating |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| skidder |
|
|||
|
mystro wrote: even if they were illeagal drags i doubt people would be able tah cause they would have to cross a river to do so bypass friends with uhf blockin entrance and turn off there headlights half a kay away
someone needs to get over fast and furious
to think a stock lancer could beat a BA especially in top end is a joke...
_________________ EVL098 wrote: Cramping in the hand from having it on your Wang for an excessive period of time is a definate con. Seriously do people google "f**k up modifications for Fords owned by Jews" and get linked straight to this site nowadays? AU,factory fitted tickford kit/IRS, t5,Sports ryder/KYB: gone. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
