|
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
i have a BBM im selling at the moment only because i've heard that the features of the BBM are lessened when a turbo is added.
will a BBM make more power/torque in a turbo setup when compared to the log manifold? i do understand how the BBM works, so im not asking about that.. if the actual function of the BBM isn't as great in a turbo setup, would the BBM without butterflies be a better choice over the log?
_________________ {DESCRIPTION} |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| XR-Lane |
|
|||
|
This belongs in the forced induction workshop.
Ill move it there for you 
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| misk_one |
|
|||
|
ahh sorry mate, wasn't sure where to put it
_________________ {DESCRIPTION} |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| EBXR8380 |
|
|||
|
BBM is best with boxed upper and front throttle fitted..
With BBM removed & plugged.. Turbo engines don't require long runners to gain torque.. There is nothing wrong with the early E series inlets either...
_________________ As in ZOOM 126 edition |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| krisisdog |
|
|||
|
Generally in a BBM the butterflys are removed. If you've got a BBM leave it and add a plenum.
If you've got a log manifold piping is easier to run, and for boosted applications the log is pretty good. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests |
