|
shane falcon futura |
|
||
|
ok done some reserch on this fuel reg presure rubish a mate had a turbo on a ef standard fuel reg no rising rate reg ..7 psi boost blew 3 pistons out by the fuel system leaning out ok ..engine destroyed,, finnished throw it in the bin ..then installed a second hand ex wrecker engine fairly good compresion ok we installed a vortech 12:1 fuel reg and installed a walbro fuel pump with a j3 chip for the computer the bloody thing goes like a cat with its tail on fire so yeah no more leaning out have only 3 items installed with the computer and running 8 psi boost ..so i laugh when dill brains get on here and talk s**t ......about fork lifts being simular to turbo car iv worked on both completly two different systems
_________________ BANNED |
||
Top | |
TROYMAN |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: ok done some reserch on this fuel reg presure rubish a mate had a turbo on a ef standard fuel reg no rising rate reg ..7 psi boost blew 3 pistons out by the fuel system leaning out ok ..engine destroyed,, finnished throw it in the bin ..then installed a second hand ex wrecker engine fairly good compresion ok we installed a vortech 12:1 fuel reg and installed a walbro fuel pump with a j3 chip for the computer the bloody thing goes like a cat with its tail on fire so yeah no more leaning out have only 3 items installed with the computer and running 8 psi boost ..so i laugh when dill brains get on here and talk s**t ......about fork lifts being simular to turbo car iv worked on both completly two different systems the problem with your mates set would have been because of a poor tune or no tune at all.. a properly set up fuel system dont need a 12:1 fuel reg, it all comes down to the correct ecu ,tuned for larger injectors and fuel pump. just throwing on a turbo with factory ecu std injectors,std fuel pump and std reg is asking for trouble.. im not saying a 12:1 reg wont work, but imo it is more of a bandaid solution.. and i guess its refered to a bandaid solution because a 12:1 reg is a damn site cheaper than a $1500 aftermarket ecu |
||
Top | |
Gav_21 |
|
||
|
ok so instead of makin a new thread, can someone just quickly tell me if a T3/T4 with a T04E centre would be good enough for a 3.9L?? only looking to run 6psi an make about 160RWKW thanks
|
||
Top | |
ToranaGuy |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: ok so instead of makin a new thread, can someone just quickly tell me if a T3/T4 with a T04E centre would be good enough for a 3.9L?? only looking to run 6psi an make about 160RWKW thanks It might be, depending on the trim of the turbo. Need to look at what the original AIT's run for a turbo to get an idea... Cheers ToranaGuy
_________________ I am the ToranaGuy!|74 Lh Torana Turbo|78 Hz PanelVan|86 Mighty Boy Ute|93 EB2 Ghia,GT Mockup,5spd,LPGI,Full Leather|2 x EB Xr8 5spd's|{DESCRIPTION}|{DESCRIPTION}|{DESCRIPTION}| |
|||
Top | |
Gav_21 |
|
||
|
oh yeh forgot to add that the front is a A/R 70 an the rear is a A/R 63
|
||
Top | |
ToranaGuy |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: oh yeh forgot to add that the front is a A/R 70 an the rear is a A/R 63 Depends on the trim of the wheel, .63 might be too small for a falcon 4.0 engine in a T3 size. Cheers ToranaGuy
_________________ I am the ToranaGuy!|74 Lh Torana Turbo|78 Hz PanelVan|86 Mighty Boy Ute|93 EB2 Ghia,GT Mockup,5spd,LPGI,Full Leather|2 x EB Xr8 5spd's|{DESCRIPTION}|{DESCRIPTION}|{DESCRIPTION}| |
|||
Top | |
huggiebear |
|
|||
|
GT35/40's run a 1.06 or 1.16 rear housing and spool up a little later int he revs, but i wouldnt go under .80 rear housing IMO otherwise you might run out of puff, especially with a smaller turbo
|
|||
Top | |
Gav_21 |
|
||
|
hmm yeh i didnt want to go any lower that an 80 rear but this turbo came up cheap an thought it could get me round for abit lol
|
||
Top | |
misk_one |
|
|||
|
anything under .86 in anything smaller than a GT35/40 will be a restriction.
the a/r size is relative to the size of the comp or turbine wheel that is being measured.
_________________ {DESCRIPTION} |
|||
Top | |
Gav_21 |
|
||
|
ok another question, this may have already been answered if so sorry lol the oil breather hose that connects to the throttle body. instead of connecting it to the inlet pipe on the turbo could u just buy one of these...
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/SMALL-MINI-AIR-O ... 4cf14d732a |
||
Top | |
dazza027 |
|
||
|
If its a non ADR 27a car, ie old, then yes. If not, then no. AFAIK.
|
||
Top | |
huggiebear |
|
|||
|
or find a EF-AU thats dual fuel and take the spacer piece from the ICS and run a catch can and place the vac line to this.
a few boosted guys are doing it this way, keeps it ADR approved |
|||
Top | |
huggiebear |
|
|||
|
also if you run an AU throttle body then there is no need to block the factory hole for the breather pipes as AU's one goes directly into the intake pipe not the T/B
|
|||
Top | |
TROYMAN |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: or find a EF-AU thats dual fuel and take the spacer piece from the ICS and run a catch can and place the vac line to this. a few boosted guys are doing it this way, keeps it ADR approved the issue i see with this, is if you connect you rocker cover breather or catch can to this it will pressurise under boost, unless it going to the pcv valve, |
||
Top | |
huggiebear |
|
|||
|
well that was one of the ones but its not hard to use an EA-ED one in-line for the rear breather. or even a universal one way valve on the line to the T/B. ill have to have a close look to how it works...
but my plan is to use one of these in my setup as im trying to hide as many hoses as possible |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests |