|
| ALS008 |
|
||
|
|
||
| Top | |
||
| Steady ED |
|
|||
|
Not that surprising. 1.7 rockers help.
Goes to show how much the E7s hold them back.
_________________ ED XR8 Sprint - S-Trim, V500, 249rwkw |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| mitchg911 |
|
|||
|
remembering that its running a carby.. thats probably not unfeasable.. would be interesting to see the same test done with other alloy heads in the same class.. trickflow, edelbrock etc just for comparison..
_________________ BF XR6T 6spd Auto. 60lb injectors, Hybrid Cooler, Custom Piping, Custom Surge Tank, Actuator. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| COBRAED |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: remembering that its running a carby.. thats probably not unfeasable.. would be interesting to see the same test done with other alloy heads in the same class.. trickflow, edelbrock etc just for comparison.. Hi Fella's,
Could that ( 400hp with stock cam) be done with the GT40P head's,in a ED 5.0L? and what would you have to do to achieve it?, any advice i'de love to hear it!!. Cheers Jason. 
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
{USERNAME} wrote: remembering that its running a carby.. thats probably not unfeasable.. would be interesting to see the same test done with other alloy heads in the same class.. trickflow, edelbrock etc just for comparison..
I've got an article here some where that has a 400hp EFI 302 running the stock cam. |
||
| Top | |
||
| XH5LWEPN |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: Hi Fella's,
Could that ( 400hp with stock cam) be done with the GT40P head's,in a ED 5.0L? and what would you have to do to achieve it?, any advice i'de love to hear it!!. Cheers Jason. The quick answer is......No!!
_________________ STREETBUILT RACING |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| One Drone |
|
|||
|
A supercharger.. Which would probably end up being cheaper as well.
_________________ There are 10 types of people in this world. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| ozrunner |
|
||
|
Impressive, but the wording "stock cam" is a bit of a misnomer when using 1.7 rockers as that changes the cam timing so it's not really running a "stock cam" per say
|
||
| Top | |
||
| xr8boy |
|
||
|
misnomer... maybe, but its still the stock cam regardless of what ratio rockers you run
_________________ New project 5.4l 331ci S380R, 8.2 4.125 Man o war, Billet LAE crank, Jon Kaase Heads, Pauter Rods, JE pistons |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
{USERNAME} wrote: misnomer... maybe, but its still the stock cam regardless of what ratio rockers you run
agreed it's still the same camshaft that ford put in the engine |
||
| Top | |
||
| mitchg911 |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: remembering that its running a carby.. thats probably not unfeasable.. would be interesting to see the same test done with other alloy heads in the same class.. trickflow, edelbrock etc just for comparison.. I've got an article here some where that has a 400hp EFI 302 running the stock cam. only reason i commented about the carby is due to the much bigger shorter runners than that of say a HO manifold... what intake etc was the EFI one running?
_________________ BF XR6T 6spd Auto. 60lb injectors, Hybrid Cooler, Custom Piping, Custom Surge Tank, Actuator. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| xcabbi |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: Impressive, but the wording "stock cam" is a bit of a misnomer when using 1.7 rockers as that changes the cam timing so it's not really running a "stock cam" per say
Rocker ratio's change lift not timing. But since most advertised duration is at 0.050" then duration might change slightly with a larger ratio set of rockers, but only slightly. |
||
| Top | |
||
| green car |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: Impressive, but the wording "stock cam" is a bit of a misnomer when using 1.7 rockers as that changes the cam timing so it's not really running a "stock cam" per say
You cant change cam timing with a rocker ratio change you need an adjustable,multi keyway timing set to change it.And even if you did advance or retard the cam it is most definitely still a stock cam.
_________________ 165 Killer Wasps all packaged in a green kmart car, almost an explorer in a way... |
||
| Top | |
||
| tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: remembering that its running a carby.. thats probably not unfeasable.. would be interesting to see the same test done with other alloy heads in the same class.. trickflow, edelbrock etc just for comparison.. I've got an article here some where that has a 400hp EFI 302 running the stock cam. only reason i commented about the carby is due to the much bigger shorter runners than that of say a HO manifold... what intake etc was the EFI one running? I found the article, to correct the power figure first, it was 372hp @ 6100rpm peak torque was 361lb/ft @ 4700rpm. It was based on a 91' mustang GT engine, stock running E7TE heads and HO manifold, the only add on was a set of kooks 1 5/8inch 4into1 headers because thats what the dyno operater had at the time. ECU was an A9L and coil was an MSD blaster3. baseline dyno runs made 251hp @ 5000rpm and 305lb/ft @ 3600rpm they went through a bunch of add ons befor testing the full package. final package was: rebuilt stock short engine. c&l maf edelbrock 70mm TB and EGR spacer ford 1.7:1 cobra rocker arms edelbrock performer rpm2 intake performer rpm heads A9L ecu with SCT chip for tuning. 24lb injectors. a comp cams XE270HR cam made 388hp @ 6000 and 374lb/ft @ 5000rpm. |
||
| Top | |
||
| mitchg911 |
|
|||
|
still quite impressive.. interesting that they didnt make 400 even with the cam swap.. i guess its a real compliment to the afr heads
-mitch
_________________ BF XR6T 6spd Auto. 60lb injectors, Hybrid Cooler, Custom Piping, Custom Surge Tank, Actuator. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
