|
| Mont5.0 |
|
|||
|
^^(2 post up) only to loose all his performance. what you want?-sound or go!
OP is opting for performance. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| XR23IL |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: ^^(2 post up) only to loose all his performance. what you want?-sound or go! OP is opting for performance. That exhaust on a stock as a rock devil r xr 8 put 214.9 rwkw so i would call that both i know of another devil r that was 195rwkw stock as a rock. I think that it estates 2 both 
_________________ If in doubt, rev it out |
||
| Top | |
||
| EBXR8380 |
|
|||
|
A s Pete said 2 1/2 twin is the right size..
Just for tech.. I had single 3" on my turbo engine..Left there from old N/A engine... It made 370 rwkw before there was no gain and back pressure raised very quick with boost power levels... I'm NOT saying single 3" is better but my thoughts are 2X's 2 1/2 pipes will flow atleast 350 kw.. Yes N/A is different to forced induction.. But the flow is still required ... 2 1/2" twins over single gives better tone, less drone, better less restrictive muffler efficiency... So fitting twin 3" is way too large... Unless your building a 500+ h.p engine...
_________________ As in ZOOM 126 edition Last edited by EBXR8380 on Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total. |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| 67RCE |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: ^^(2 post up) only to loose all his performance. what you want?-sound or go! OP is opting for performance. That exhaust on a stock as a rock devil r xr 8 put 214.9 rwkw so i would call that both i know of another devil r that was 195rwkw stock as a rock. I think that it estates 2 both you do realise Dyno's are tuning equipment! Not accurate. Also, there is more to performance than outright power. See xcabbi's signature for details!
_________________ ILL60 - EF XR8, Sunroof, Ticky Kit, 19x8.5/19x11 TE37's, 347, AFr185's, TFS BoxRcustom converter, Hurst Quarterstick, huge billet cam. |
||
| Top | |
||
| XR23IL |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: ^^(2 post up) only to loose all his performance. what you want?-sound or go! OP is opting for performance. That exhaust on a stock as a rock devil r xr 8 put 214.9 rwkw so i would call that both i know of another devil r that was 195rwkw stock as a rock. I think that it estates 2 both you do realise Dyno's are tuning equipment! Not accurate. Also, there is more to performance than outright power. See xcabbi's signature for details! Yes i nudeqstane that but it appears as though it's some 4 both. I will have 2 c if there is any dyno sheet 4 it as this was the base reading taken b4 being blown..
_________________ If in doubt, rev it out |
||
| Top | |
||
| XR9UTE |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: ^^(2 post up) only to loose all his performance. what you want?-sound or go! OP is opting for performance. That exhaust on a stock as a rock devil r xr 8 put 214.9 rwkw so i would call that both i know of another devil r that was 195rwkw stock as a rock. I think that it estates 2 both you do realise Dyno's are tuning equipment! Not accurate. Also, there is more to performance than outright power. See xcabbi's signature for details! Yes i nudeqstane that but it appears as though it's some 4 both. I will have 2 c if there is any dyno sheet 4 it as this was the base reading taken b4 being blown.. Can we have that again in english? Have you got dyno tests with the torque curves of both exhausts before and after? Of course I'm assuming you changed from one exhaust type to another? |
||
| Top | |
||
| XR23IL |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: ^^(2 post up) only to loose all his performance. what you want?-sound or go! OP is opting for performance. That exhaust on a stock as a rock devil r xr 8 put 214.9 rwkw so i would call that both i know of another devil r that was 195rwkw stock as a rock. I think that it estates 2 both you do realise Dyno's are tuning equipment! Not accurate. Also, there is more to performance than outright power. See xcabbi's signature for details! Yes i nudeqstane that but it appears as though it's some 4 both. I will have 2 c if there is any dyno sheet 4 it as this was the base reading taken b4 being blown.. Can we have that again in english? Have you got dyno tests with the torque curves of both exhausts before and after? Of course I'm assuming you changed from one exhaust type to another? Lol sorry mate using my phone. It's my brothers car it was only ever dynoed once n/a and that was with the Di Filippo already on. I have 2 c if he still has it i know it, not 1 2 hold on 2 now thats it's 542 rwhp lol but he might still have it laying around.
_________________ If in doubt, rev it out |
||
| Top | |
||
| chadhirst |
|
||
|
ay mate, ive got an xr8 bfmk2 ute with pacemakers that go into a 2.5inch pipe that then goes in a 3 inch pipe witch goes into a mufler its a twin exhaust, and its loud and tough but it also crackels back in every gear, i would go for the 2.5 inch into muflers mate?
|
||
| Top | |
||
| xcabbi |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: you do realise Dyno's are tuning equipment! Not accurate. Also, there is more to performance than outright power. See xcabbi's signature for details! What part? the Power and Torque definitions or catching the gay flu? |
||
| Top | |
||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 31 guests |
