|
| Gab1 |
|
|||
|
Seems to me that the 4 speed single rail gearboxes are cheaper than T5's, so I'm wondering why I couldn't re drill a T5 Bellhousing and re drill the gearbox cross member on an E Series to make it fit? I may just use a T5 but I'm wondering if a single rail is viable?
|
|||
| Top | |
|||
| RtvNut |
|
||
|
behind a 6, marginal, behind a V8.... good luck
|
||
| Top | |
||
| SWC |
|
||
|
Gab1 wrote: Seems to me that the 4 speed single rail gearboxes are cheaper than T5's, so I'm wondering why I couldn't re drill a T5 Bellhousing and re drill the gearbox cross member on an E Series to make it fit? I may just use a T5 but I'm wondering if a single rail is viable? The reason that they are cheaper is that the aren't as good and they are 4 speed compared to 5 speed. RtvNut wrote: behind a 6, marginal, behind a V8.... good luck Agreed. behind a 4.0 marginal, 5.0 BOOM. |
||
| Top | |
||
| Gab1 |
|
|||
|
SWC wrote: Gab1 wrote: Seems to me that the 4 speed single rail gearboxes are cheaper than T5's, so I'm wondering why I couldn't re drill a T5 Bellhousing and re drill the gearbox cross member on an E Series to make it fit? I may just use a T5 but I'm wondering if a single rail is viable? The reason that they are cheaper is that the aren't as good and they are 4 speed compared to 5 speed. RtvNut wrote: behind a 6, marginal, behind a V8.... good luck Agreed. behind a 4.0 marginal, 5.0 BOOM. They put them behind 302's and 351's years ago, they seemed ok, was only considering putting it behind a 4.0, I heard single rails were a strong gearbox. But yeah I'd prefer the 5 speed. Gab |
|||
| Top | |
|||
| RtvNut |
|
||
|
Gab1 wrote: They put them behind 302's and 351's years ago, they seemed ok They also put the 5 speed from a sigma into XF's.... they were alright as long as you behaved... |
||
| Top | |
||
| SWC |
|
||
|
Gab1 wrote: They put them behind 302's and 351's years ago, they seemed ok, was only considering putting it behind a 4.0, I heard single rails were a strong gearbox. But yeah I'd prefer the 5 speed. Gab And the Kw on those were less than the 4.0L. |
||
| Top | |
||
| Who is online |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests |
