|
Gab1 |
|
|||
|
Seems to me that the 4 speed single rail gearboxes are cheaper than T5's, so I'm wondering why I couldn't re drill a T5 Bellhousing and re drill the gearbox cross member on an E Series to make it fit? I may just use a T5 but I'm wondering if a single rail is viable?
|
|||
Top | |
RtvNut |
|
||
|
behind a 6, marginal, behind a V8.... good luck
|
||
Top | |
SWC |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: Seems to me that the 4 speed single rail gearboxes are cheaper than T5's, so I'm wondering why I couldn't re drill a T5 Bellhousing and re drill the gearbox cross member on an E Series to make it fit? I may just use a T5 but I'm wondering if a single rail is viable? The reason that they are cheaper is that the aren't as good and they are 4 speed compared to 5 speed. {USERNAME} wrote: behind a 6, marginal, behind a V8.... good luck Agreed. behind a 4.0 marginal, 5.0 BOOM. |
||
Top | |
Gab1 |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: Seems to me that the 4 speed single rail gearboxes are cheaper than T5's, so I'm wondering why I couldn't re drill a T5 Bellhousing and re drill the gearbox cross member on an E Series to make it fit? I may just use a T5 but I'm wondering if a single rail is viable? The reason that they are cheaper is that the aren't as good and they are 4 speed compared to 5 speed. {USERNAME} wrote: behind a 6, marginal, behind a V8.... good luck Agreed. behind a 4.0 marginal, 5.0 BOOM. They put them behind 302's and 351's years ago, they seemed ok, was only considering putting it behind a 4.0, I heard single rails were a strong gearbox. But yeah I'd prefer the 5 speed. Gab |
|||
Top | |
RtvNut |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: They put them behind 302's and 351's years ago, they seemed ok They also put the 5 speed from a sigma into XF's.... they were alright as long as you behaved... |
||
Top | |
SWC |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: They put them behind 302's and 351's years ago, they seemed ok, was only considering putting it behind a 4.0, I heard single rails were a strong gearbox. But yeah I'd prefer the 5 speed. Gab And the Kw on those were less than the 4.0L. |
||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests |