|
XR62003 |
|
||
|
Looking at installing a 100 CPSI High Flow cat next week when I have competition pacemaker extractors with full remap and custom tune with a 83 deg thermo and mandrel band 2.5" stainless sports exhaust system installed.
Has anyone had a 100 CPSI cat installed. If so are you happy with the result. Has anyone had any canneries from the noise it emits?? |
||
Top | |
phil545 |
|
|||
|
Can't comment on a 100 cell but i have a 200 cell ( i dont think there is overal much difference in flow rates tbh) But i love my exhaust and its not too loud. I think it will more be if they check you for emissions that is when you will most likely run into problems with being defected etc
_________________ I hate arriving at my destination as then I have to get out of my car! |
|||
Top | |
arm79 |
|
|||
|
It'll drop at least a second off your 1/4 mile time.
|
|||
Top | |
tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
A few years ago a cat was a cat. no cared about CPSI, and guess what, no one is making any more power now.
so if you think you can waste the money, go for it. |
||
Top | |
slammeb |
|
||
|
arm79 wrote: It'll drop at least a second off your 1/4 mile time. lol |
||
Top | |
xcabbi |
|
||
|
tickford_6 wrote: A few years ago a cat was a cat. no cared about CPSI, and guess what, no one is making any more power now. so if you think you can waste the money, go for it. Not to mention that 100 CPSI cats are not emissions legal by default. The "I'm getting a 100cpsi cat" crowd are a new version of the "I'm gutting my cat" crowd except they think that by keeping some form of functioning cat on their cars that its all emissions legal. |
||
Top | |
tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
xcabbi wrote: tickford_6 wrote: A few years ago a cat was a cat. no cared about CPSI, and guess what, no one is making any more power now. so if you think you can waste the money, go for it. Not to mention that 100 CPSI cats are not emissions legal by default. The "I'm getting a 100cpsi cat" crowd are a new version of the "I'm gutting my cat" crowd except they think that by keeping some form of functioning cat on their cars that its all emissions legal. Right, now i get it, I struggle to keep up with most of the stupid wanker things people are doing with cars these days. |
||
Top | |
Matt_jew |
|
||
|
Maybe not emissions legal if they do a sniffer test , but under NSW road law all it says is you need to have a functioning cat fitted.
Never says how well it has to function................
_________________ xr6turnip wrote: More people paid for a ride in a VT commodore then an AU Falcon so the VT is superior.
Based on that fact my Mum is the best around! |
||
Top | |
tickford_6 |
|
||
Posts: 6449 Joined: 11th Nov 2004 |
ADRs They trump any state rule.
|
||
Top | |
cjh |
|
||||||
|
Here is my cat. That is a 600mm steel rule beside it. It has a 2 & 1/2" inlet and twin 2 & 1/4" outlets. It is all stainless steel construction....and it is a Zuna-Starker cat....from a BMW...emission legal, high flow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJTh9F3Vgg0 Thats 204.5 rwhp or 150 rwkw....on a std cam and ECU.
_________________ http://youtu.be/jJTh9F3Vgg0 |
||||||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 111 guests |