|
FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
the amp sees a 2ohm load, not the sub
|
||
Top | |
Stone |
|
||
|
lukas_bartko wrote: OK then i have a single 4 OHM voice coil sub and i am sure they cant run @2 OHM Yeah, some people like to go off on tangents and not answer the original question A monoblock is not needed for a 4 ohm sub, a 2 channel bridged is cheaper and can be used in other ways if required. |
||
Top | |
Falcon_92_EB |
|
||
|
Cheers, so a decent 2 channel is the go. because at the moment ive got an audioline amp and its pretty old.
|
||
Top | |
ranio |
|
||
|
option audio 800rms mono, great little unit, better to have more than enough then not enough, this way it leaves room for upgrades if you decide to go that little bit better!
800rms at 1ohm 500rms at 2ohm 300rms at 4ohm should be able to get a new one for under $200 these days! |
||
Top | |
Stone |
|
||
|
ranio wrote: option audio 800rms mono, great little unit, better to have more than enough then not enough, this way it leaves room for upgrades if you decide to go that little bit better! 800rms at 1ohm 500rms at 2ohm 300rms at 4ohm should be able to get a new one for under $200 these days! But he wants 350Wrms at 4 ohm... You've just recommended an amp that doesn't make the power he requires. If he was going for Option Audio, the OAA160 would be a better choice as it makes 350Wrms at 4 ohm. But personally, I'd opt for an amp that does at least 400Wrms at 4 ohm just for the extra headroom. I just had a quick look for 2 channels that do 400Wrms at 4 ohm when bridged and there's not really any in the budget range... If your budget is important then it might actually work out cheaper to get a monoblock that does 400Wrms at 4 ohm (like the others have said ). At least the amp will have an easy life only running 4 ohm. |
||
Top | |
ranio |
|
||
|
Stone wrote: ranio wrote: option audio 800rms mono, great little unit, better to have more than enough then not enough, this way it leaves room for upgrades if you decide to go that little bit better! 800rms at 1ohm 500rms at 2ohm 300rms at 4ohm should be able to get a new one for under $200 these days! But he wants 350Wrms at 4 ohm... You've just recommended an amp that doesn't make the power he requires. If he was going for Option Audio, the OAA160 would be a better choice as it makes 350Wrms at 4 ohm. But personally, I'd opt for an amp that does at least 400Wrms at 4 ohm just for the extra headroom. I just had a quick look for 2 channels that do 400Wrms at 4 ohm when bridged and there's not really any in the budget range... If your budget is important then it might actually work out cheaper to get a monoblock that does 400Wrms at 4 ohm (like the others have said ). At least the amp will have an easy life only running 4 ohm. just wire the setup so its 2ohm loading at the amp no the sub! gotta love the workings of DVC |
||
Top | |
FordFairmont |
|
||
Posts: 6113 Joined: 8th May 2007 |
some people need to do some reading about Ohm loads
how exactly do you make a single 4ohm sub run @ 2ohm? 2 Ohm stereo and 4 Ohm Mono are the same. Put 2 of those subs onto a monoblock and that amp will see 2 Ohm stereo, but the subs still run @ 4 Ohm 2 Ohm Mono isnt supported by many of the cheaper amps and would cause amp failure. http://www.crutchfield.com/S-uOzlFI4ko1 ... iring.html |
||
Top | |
Stone |
|
||
|
ranio wrote: Stone wrote: ranio wrote: option audio 800rms mono, great little unit, better to have more than enough then not enough, this way it leaves room for upgrades if you decide to go that little bit better! 800rms at 1ohm 500rms at 2ohm 300rms at 4ohm should be able to get a new one for under $200 these days! But he wants 350Wrms at 4 ohm... You've just recommended an amp that doesn't make the power he requires. If he was going for Option Audio, the OAA160 would be a better choice as it makes 350Wrms at 4 ohm. But personally, I'd opt for an amp that does at least 400Wrms at 4 ohm just for the extra headroom. I just had a quick look for 2 channels that do 400Wrms at 4 ohm when bridged and there's not really any in the budget range... If your budget is important then it might actually work out cheaper to get a monoblock that does 400Wrms at 4 ohm (like the others have said ). At least the amp will have an easy life only running 4 ohm. just wire the setup so its 2ohm loading at the amp no the sub! gotta love the workings of DVC It's not a DVC sub. |
||
Top | |
ranio |
|
||
|
FordFairmont wrote: some people need to do some reading about Ohm loads how exactly do you make a single 4ohm sub run @ 2ohm? 2 Ohm stereo and 4 Ohm Mono are the same. Put 2 of those subs onto a monoblock and that amp will see 2 Ohm stereo, but the subs still run @ 4 Ohm 2 Ohm Mono isnt supported by many of the cheaper amps and would cause amp failure. http://www.crutchfield.com/S-uOzlFI4ko1 ... iring.html can you please link me to this sub, from what i can find the MB QUART 350WRMS Sub only comes in a DVC |
||
Top | |
Stone |
|
||
|
ranio wrote: can you please link me to this sub, from what i can find the MB QUART 350WRMS Sub only comes in a DVC Here's one: http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_197 ... +304S.html How can you continue on about DVC when the original poster said this: lukas_bartko wrote: OK then i have a single 4 OHM voice coil sub and i am sure they cant run @2 OHM
|
||
Top | |
ranio |
|
||
|
Stone wrote: ranio wrote: can you please link me to this sub, from what i can find the MB QUART 350WRMS Sub only comes in a DVC Here's one: http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_197 ... +304S.html How can you continue on about DVC when the original poster said this: lukas_bartko wrote: OK then i have a single 4 OHM voice coil sub and i am sure they cant run @2 OHM Thanks for link and yes OP did say that, but OP also said 350! which is a DVC from what i can find so I'm just trying to find out what the actual sub is, I'm not trying to start anything I'm genuinely interested. |
||
Top | |
Stone |
|
||
|
Should just ask him for the model number then
|
||
Top | |
Falcon_92_EB |
|
||
|
That is the sub it came in the box the only modelnumber i can find is MB12S
Last edited by Falcon_92_EB on Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total. |
||
Top | |
Fairmont_03_5.4 |
|
|||
|
Take the sub out and have a look on the back for the proper model number, if you havent already. When i googled 350W MBQuart subs i could only find DVC subs.
This one in the link is 300W RMS and is different to the one you have pictured in that boot. Secondly the one on the website has a chrome ring around it where the one in the boot doesnt, and lastly the one in the boot doesnt have the word "Formula" written beneath the MBQuart logo. http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_197 ... +304S.html I reckon youve got the DVC, but i could be wrong cuz i dont know much about MBQuart stuff.
_________________ Chaos, Panic and Disorder. My work here is finally done. |
|||
Top | |
Fairmont_03_5.4 |
|
|||
|
I meant this link.
http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_197 ... +304S.html
_________________ Chaos, Panic and Disorder. My work here is finally done. |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |