|
JOSE |
|
||||||
|
spent last weekend working on this one still has to be cleaned up a bit and im widening the inlet an moving it back.
_________________ Because i can. Last edited by JOSE on Tue Dec 06, 2005 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total. |
||||||
Top | |
Southy |
|
|||
|
looks good so far! clean that damn engine bay!
|
|||
Top | |
Andrew J |
|
|||
|
Remind me again why youre doing this?
_________________ The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
|
|||
Top | |
Tommi |
|
||
|
Are you going to use the EF air intake as well....??
|
||
Top | |
uglybob |
|
|||
|
to do it right you really need to do the full BBM conversion!
_________________ R.I.P. Scotty |
|||
Top | |
JOSE |
|
|||
|
Andrew J wrote: Remind me again why youre doing this? Because i went to the wreckers with more money than i needed for the parts i went for ($30 for EF airbox +lid + stuffed ED lid + snorkel - seemed too good to me) tommi wrote: Are you going to use the EF air intake as well....?? Nah, CBF too many things to change uglybob wrote: to do it right you really need to do the full BBM conversion!
Stupid me HAD an EF BBM, but i sold it (for $20 more than it cost) im more or less just making a larger version of my standard intake - projected cost is $45
_________________ Because i can. |
|||
Top | |
Andrew J |
|
|||
|
But there no point? Ergh! lol, well have fun with that
_________________ The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
|
|||
Top | |
Disco Frank |
|
|||
|
good job either way
more air into engine = more fuel =more power...
_________________ RIP SCOTT |
|||
Top | |
Southy |
|
|||
|
if you really wana f**k your bonnet up you could always make a scoop and join it to the intake thats not being used (the one where if it was an ef would be going into the manifold)
|
|||
Top | |
JOSE |
|
|||
|
Southy wrote: if you really wana f**k your bonnet up you could always make a scoop and join it to the intake thats not being used (the one where if it was an ef would be going into the manifold)
Ive already thought of that, but whats under the bonnet doesnt warrant things ontop of the bonnet.
_________________ Because i can. |
|||
Top | |
opto |
|
|||
|
Im sorry to say but it looks kinda Frankensteiney.
_________________ I post here cos the russian tank driver doesn't |
|||
Top | |
JOSE |
|
|||
|
opto wrote: Im sorry to say but it looks kinda Frankensteiney.
You should see it close up!!
_________________ Because i can. |
|||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests |