Fordmods Logo

Lower Compression for Turbo 

 

Page 3 of 3 [ 37 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

 
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:31 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

EBXR8380 wrote:
The correct or another term is quench . Opening up the chambers on the outer edges of valves is a good way to lower comp as it's bassically relieving valve which increases flow... Quench is not such a big deal with forced induction as it is with hi po n/a engine... But the idea is to get one big flame front and not many, as this causes detonation... Note the 351m / 400m motor in the States is notorious for detonation yet it has approx 8.5 compression and Clevo style open chamber heads.. The main reason for bad detonation?? The piston is designed to be way down bore .. The fix to this was to fit pistons with pin height lower essentually bringing piston closer to deck. Even though it raised compression it prevented detonation...



exactly the reason i don't like thicker head gaskets and head shims
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: detination
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:48 pm 
Parts Gopher
Offline

Posts: 57

Joined: 14th Sep 2005

Location: mackay
QLD, Australia

I no this is way of the topic of turbo's but using premium unlended fuel will help stop detination.
The higher the octain rating of the fuel the less chance you have of detination.
I learn't this at TAFE today
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:24 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 71

Posts: 3555

Joined: 7th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Power: 482 rwkw

Location: Penrith
NSW, Australia

tickford_6 wrote:
EBXR8380 wrote:
The correct or another term is quench . Opening up the chambers on the outer edges of valves is a good way to lower comp as it's bassically relieving valve which increases flow... Quench is not such a big deal with forced induction as it is with hi po n/a engine... But the idea is to get one big flame front and not many, as this causes detonation... Note the 351m / 400m motor in the States is notorious for detonation yet it has approx 8.5 compression and Clevo style open chamber heads.. The main reason for bad detonation?? The piston is designed to be way down bore .. The fix to this was to fit pistons with pin height lower essentually bringing piston closer to deck. Even though it raised compression it prevented detonation...



exactly the reason i don't like thicker head gaskets and head shims

Yep and GOOD safe tune!!!
I do find however that the smaller bore motors like 4.0 can get away with higher compression to a point...

 

_________________

As in ZOOM 126 edition
331 Dart block,3.25/ 4340 steel crank, Oliver rods,TFS ported track heat heads, TFS track heat inlet Twin SC61 turbo's
Project 1UZ-EF has started.. S475 Turbo 4.0 V8 Mustang Celica.....

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:25 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

nothing like a GOOD tune.
but you shouldn't just realy on the tunner. when the engine is built you should make every effort you can to decrease the likelyhood of detonation.
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:04 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 71

Posts: 3555

Joined: 7th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Power: 482 rwkw

Location: Penrith
NSW, Australia

tickford_6 wrote:
nothing like a GOOD tune.
but you shouldn't just realy on the tunner. when the engine is built you should make every effort you can to decrease the likelyhood of detonation.

Yes I think I may have got alttle carried away with 27cc dish with 61 cc chambers on my 330W strocker though...BUT it gives you every oppertunity to make BIG power...7.8 compression!!!

 

_________________

As in ZOOM 126 edition
331 Dart block,3.25/ 4340 steel crank, Oliver rods,TFS ported track heat heads, TFS track heat inlet Twin SC61 turbo's
Project 1UZ-EF has started.. S475 Turbo 4.0 V8 Mustang Celica.....

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:47 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline

Posts: 6449

Joined: 11th Nov 2004

EBXR8380 wrote:
tickford_6 wrote:
nothing like a GOOD tune.
but you shouldn't just realy on the tunner. when the engine is built you should make every effort you can to decrease the likelyhood of detonation.

Yes I think I may have got alttle carried away with 27cc dish with 61 cc chambers on my 330W strocker though...BUT it gives you every oppertunity to make BIG power...7.8 compression!!!



tell me, how much boost do you plan on using?
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:39 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 71

Posts: 3555

Joined: 7th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Power: 482 rwkw

Location: Penrith
NSW, Australia

I have twin SC61's .. So far 18 Lb at 440 rwkw but have issues with corrupt spark....
So engine has come out to tidy some wiring on right hand side guard and cut back old loom for MAF etc...Then fitted a Motec crank angle senser / disc on front pulley.. I may have fond why I had issues??? The wire gong to alterrnator was close to sparl plug leads so there may have been some bad transmission interferance in electrical system?
The dissy is only used to pick up #1 cylinder now. All but one vanes have been removed...
Possibly 25 Lb boost..Will fitnew Haltech screen and wide band 02 senser for efficiancy and economy....

 

_________________

As in ZOOM 126 edition
331 Dart block,3.25/ 4340 steel crank, Oliver rods,TFS ported track heat heads, TFS track heat inlet Twin SC61 turbo's
Project 1UZ-EF has started.. S475 Turbo 4.0 V8 Mustang Celica.....

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:
Sort by  
 Page 3 of 3  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

 

 

It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 7:03 pm All times are UTC + 11 hours

 

 

(c)2014 Total Web Solutions Australia - Australian Web Hosting and Domain Names