|
philaddis |
|
|||
|
Anyone able to make comment on difference for fuel economy between the BA MKII Ghia 4sp and the BF with the ZF 6 sp auto?
I had a drive of one the other day and they feel a lot more lively under acceleration than my BA MKII. It was a fairly heavy/spirited drive though and the trip computer was reading 18 ltrs at the end of it. My BA gets about 10.6 litres per hundred k's with a mix of freeway and suburbs. Goes down to 9.2 on a trip to Augusta and back with a bit of town running thrown in. If the town economy figures are much better for the BF, I could be tempted into an upgrade.
_________________ ED XR8 Spri-mitatio-nt |
|||
Top | |
transman |
|
||
|
The 6sp. auto uses less fuel than the 4sp. due to the convertor clutch coming on in every gear, so in theory you have less slippage in the transmission. I think the difference is around 1 litre per 100k by Fords figures. The ratios in the 6sp. make it more lively to drive. If I remember correctly first gear is 4.17 to 1, second is 2.34 to 1, and 5 & 6 are both overdrives. Also there is no 1 to 1 in the box so you are always in a reduction or overdrive ratio.
|
||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 30 guests |