Fordmods Logo

EF I6 - vacum sources? Adding some fittings in the manifold? 

 

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

 
 Post subject: EF I6 - vacum sources? Adding some fittings in the manifold?
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:18 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 11105

Joined: 15th Nov 2004

Ride: No Fords current

Location: Hobart
TAS, Australia

I need to run four vacum lines - 2 for pressure switches (1 for the water injection and 1 for the second fuel pump), 1 for the BOV and one for the FMU.
Any ideas whats the best to go off on the BBM?
With the boost gauge I used the line running to the MAP, but since this is a pretty important sensor for the fuel I thought it probably not the best idea to tap another three on there.
Capa for at least 1 of the pressure switchs seem to recomend putting a t-peice in the vacum line to the PCV - but this worries me as wouldn't it get muck in the sensor?

Or whats the go with putting some fittings into the inlet manifold?
Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: EF I6 - vacum sources? Adding some fittings in the manif
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:23 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 886

Joined: 17th Aug 2005

Gallery: 24 images

Ride: VZ SS 6Ltr ute, Honda VFR800

Location: Melbourne
VIC, Australia

Well instead of tapping into the PCV line how about the brake booster line??? I think they're the same size...

 

_________________

My Cars
2006 VZ SS cammed 6Ltr ute 295rwkW
2004 BA XR6T - 290rwkW 12.5@113mph ( SOLD )
1996 EFII Fairmont - 130rwkW 15.5@91mph ( SOLD )

Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: EF I6 - vacum sources? Adding some fittings in the manif
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:29 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 11105

Joined: 15th Nov 2004

Ride: No Fords current

Location: Hobart
TAS, Australia

{USERNAME} wrote:
Well instead of tapping into the PCV line how about the brake booster line??? I think they're the same size...


That's an idea - didn't even think of that one. Is it wise though considering the importance of brakes? But they'd still function (be it not as effectively) even if anything went wrong wouldn't they? So it should be fine...
Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:45 pm 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 71

Posts: 3555

Joined: 7th Nov 2004

Gallery: 4 images

Power: 482 rwkw

Location: Penrith
NSW, Australia

T off the lines that don't effect tune..
Its NOT hard to drill and tapp manifold...
On turbo conversions, it pays to have map and fuel reg some distance away from intake runners so they don't pulse.. The middle of manifold is ideal...

 

_________________

As in ZOOM 126 edition
331 Dart block,3.25/ 4340 steel crank, Oliver rods,TFS ported track heat heads, TFS track heat inlet Twin SC61 turbo's
Project 1UZ-EF has started.. S475 Turbo 4.0 V8 Mustang Celica.....

Top
 Profile  
 
 
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:23 am 
Getting Side Ways
Offline
User avatar

Age: 38

Posts: 11105

Joined: 15th Nov 2004

Ride: No Fords current

Location: Hobart
TAS, Australia

{USERNAME} wrote:
T off the lines that don't effect tune..
Its NOT hard to drill and tapp manifold...
On turbo conversions, it pays to have map and fuel reg some distance away from intake runners so they don't pulse.. The middle of manifold is ideal...


I think I'd actually prefer to put some new fittings into the manifold for the new items.

So you reckon I should redo the ones for the MAP and fuel reg or are the factory locations alright for those?
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:
Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1  [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
cron

 

 

It is currently Tue Dec 24, 2024 4:55 am All times are UTC + 11 hours

 

 

(c)2014 Total Web Solutions Australia - Australian Web Hosting and Domain Names