|
EBXR8380 |
|
|||
|
The front bar is hardly a xmember..
If we did it again we would just weld another bar infront and cut the old one out and tidy up so its not noticable... In the pics and engine above.. This car is turbocharged runing 270 rwkw with C4 .. Btw my Turbo V8 only uses the top part or engine bolts on bellhousing as std.. It has 483 rwkw with manual trans.. It has NO issues in this area.. Both a*** are engineered...
_________________ As in ZOOM 126 edition |
|||
Top | |
relaxed_diplomacy |
|
||
|
RD wrote: Engine torque puts the bellhousing bolts in shear and given
their significant distance from the rotational axis and your experiences it seems they are up to the task, so far, even with a couple missing. Actually, thinking again, surely the engine's torque is transmitted to the chassis via the engine mounts, and through the gearbox shafts and innards. If this is true the engine's torque, even a hot engine's torque, wouldn't put any great strain on the bellhousing bolts. Looking again at the supplied photo, i can't see the braces that are normally on the EA to EL motors. Did the AU replace these with the extended sump? It would be a shame for me to buy an AU bellhousing then have the gearbox die in the near future and end up buying another gearbox which would likely have another bellhousing on it.
_________________ wrecking 9/97 EL fairmont sedan burgundy 6cyl auto 270k modBAintake |
||
Top | |
relaxed_diplomacy |
|
||
|
After some mulling i am now thinking i will use my EB bellhousing mated
to the AU motor, as per EBXR8380's photo with the red bolts. Although, i will also conside fitting the braces as well, i have a spare pair so would be okay about trimming and drilling them. Thanks EBXR8380. I'm still welding mod's to the front 'crossmember' though, particularly for off road use.
_________________ wrecking 9/97 EL fairmont sedan burgundy 6cyl auto 270k modBAintake |
||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 125 guests |