|
Stu5766 |
|
||
Age: 43 Posts: 78 Joined: 15th Jun 2010 Ride: XD Fairmont Ghia 351 Location: Blue Mountains |
How bout a larger scale EL GT bonnet intake/bulge.
e already know it will work with the lines of the car, we just gotta increase the size. A fiber glasser mite be able to mould on up |
||
Top | |
SWC |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: Make the centre of the bonnet higher, use the existing bonnet lines, and just lift it up. would make ya look twice thats for sure. That is one of the ideas that I have in mind at the moment. A9X is out been done to death. Elanor comes to mind as does the possibility of L88 scoop. I think we will see what the mind and the cardboard comes up with over the weekend after I assemble Kathy's Motor. I still have to aquire a BA bulge in steel for another customer as it is as well as produce another XB bonnet and another for myself, then there is the rear bar for the Wagon as well as my stealth project. Ahhhh well oooh for some 48hr days. |
||
Top | |
SWC |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: How bout a larger scale EL GT bonnet intake/bulge. e already know it will work with the lines of the car, we just gotta increase the size. A fiber glasser mite be able to mould on up One of the ugliest scoops ever invented, and I thought you had taste Stu. But Fiberglass is your friend This time round I think we might be in steel. Last edited by SWC on Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total. |
||
Top | |
SWC |
|
||
|
One possibilty,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post. |
||
Top | |
Stu5766 |
|
||
Age: 43 Posts: 78 Joined: 15th Jun 2010 Ride: XD Fairmont Ghia 351 Location: Blue Mountains |
I have taste, i just tend to run out of ideas when i cant fit a shaker or a alloy catcher.
LOL |
||
Top | |
SWC |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: I have taste, i just tend to run out of ideas when i cant fit a shaker or a alloy catcher. LOL BOOM BOOM |
||
Top | |
fairlane6970 |
|
|||
|
Although I truly hate to admit it a (cough cough) VL "style" might be OK , or indeed something in that style as it is seemingly wide enough wide and height is easy enough to sort out!
_________________
|
|||
Top | |
Waggin |
|
|||
|
Maybe a few sequential scoops will do the trick. Give Pepe a call
_________________ WAG363: AUII LTD Supercharged 363 Dart Stroker [{DESCRIPTION}] |
|||
Top | |
TerroristGHIA |
|
|||
|
I think not. I will be out tinkering with it tomorrow afternoon. I have a plan that i will run by SWC and see what he thinks. Totally doable i am sure, but i need to see where it will lie in the bigger scheme of things.
Brett
_________________ The Terrorist ED Retired due to RUST. |
|||
Top | |
Matt_jew |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: I will be out tinkering with it tomorrow afternoon. I have a plan Its not this plan is it mate?
_________________ {USERNAME} wrote: More people paid for a ride in a VT commodore then an AU Falcon so the VT is superior.
Based on that fact my Mum is the best around! |
||
Top | |
TerroristGHIA |
|
|||
|
The best car ever designed, by the greatest car designer ever. No i could not compete with Homer.
Brett
_________________ The Terrorist ED Retired due to RUST. |
|||
Top | |
TerroristGHIA |
|
|||
|
Another small, but very significant update. After discussion with some people in the know. It now appears that the NSW RTA allowing a 15% increase in capacity will work in my favour.
The Terrorist currently has 5000cc listed on its papers, so therefore a 351 can be fitted using the RTA formula without an engineer. It is merely a substitute engine. Things are looking up. Brett
_________________ The Terrorist ED Retired due to RUST. |
|||
Top | |
hans hartman |
|
||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: Another small, but very significant update. After discussion with some people in the know. It now appears that the NSW RTA allowing a 15% increase in capacity will work in my favour. The Terrorist currently has 5000cc listed on its papers, so therefore a 351 can be fitted using the RTA formula without an engineer. It is merely a substitute engine. Things are looking up. Brett is that standard displacement,or flywheel kw?as cam and internal changes can double or triple flywheel kw out put,more than the car was designed for.my thoughts on it was a increase in flywheel kw out put,but we never do the maths
_________________ R.I.P HANS HARTMAN |
||
Top | |
TerroristGHIA |
|
|||
|
{USERNAME} wrote: {USERNAME} wrote: Another small, but very significant update. After discussion with some people in the know. It now appears that the NSW RTA allowing a 15% increase in capacity will work in my favour. The Terrorist currently has 5000cc listed on its papers, so therefore a 351 can be fitted using the RTA formula without an engineer. It is merely a substitute engine. Things are looking up. Brett is that standard displacement,or flywheel kw?as cam and internal changes can double or triple flywheel kw out put,more than the car was designed for.my thoughts on it was a increase in flywheel kw out put,but we never do the maths From what i understand of the legislation Hans, it is displacement. Brett
_________________ The Terrorist ED Retired due to RUST. |
|||
Top | |
dazza027 |
|
||
|
I agree. In the territory if you turbo a car there is a formula to convert to virtual swept volume (I think it is cc's x 1.3) so yeah I would say that its displacement and not kilowatts, otherwise theyd have to put every car on the dyno for rego. Thatd save a few people some money I bet.
|
||
Top | |
Who is online |
---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |